Criminal Process (OCR A-Level Law): Revision Notes
Criminal process
Introduction to the criminal courts system
The criminal courts system exists to uphold laws that prohibit certain types of behaviour in society. When individuals engage in prohibited conduct, they risk facing punishment through the criminal justice system. This threat of punishment serves as a deterrent to maintain order and promote a civilised society.
Criminal cases begin in one of two courts of first instance, meaning the courts where a case initially commences. These are the Magistrates' Court and the Crown Court. The court in which a case starts depends primarily on the seriousness of the alleged offence.
The dual court system ensures that less serious offences are dealt with quickly and efficiently in the Magistrates' Court, while the most serious crimes receive the full scrutiny of a Crown Court trial with a jury.
When someone is accused of committing a crime, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) must first determine whether there is sufficient evidence to bring a prosecution. Only the CPS has the authority to decide whether to proceed with criminal charges against a defendant.
Jurisdiction of the Magistrates' Court
The Magistrates' Court handles the vast majority of criminal cases in England and Wales. Approximately 97% of all criminal cases are dealt with in a Magistrates' Court, with over 90% being concluded at this level without progressing to a higher court.
Key functions of the Magistrates' Court
The Magistrates' Court performs several crucial functions within the criminal justice system:
Trying offences: The court tries summary offences (the least serious category) and most triable-either-way offences. This means the court hears the evidence, determines guilt or innocence, and imposes sentences where appropriate.
Plea-before-venue hearings: For triable-either-way offences, the court conducts special hearings where the defendant indicates their plea. This helps determine whether the case should be heard in the Magistrates' Court or sent to the Crown Court.
Sentencing powers: When defendants are found guilty, magistrates have the power to impose sentences. However, their sentencing powers are limited to reflect the less serious nature of offences under their jurisdiction. For a single summary offence, magistrates can impose up to six months' imprisonment, or up to 12 months total for two or more offences. They can also impose fines, generally up to £5,000.
The limited sentencing powers of the Magistrates' Court (maximum six months for a single offence or 12 months total) are a key distinguishing feature from the Crown Court. If magistrates believe their powers are insufficient after hearing a case, they can commit the defendant to the Crown Court for sentencing.
Initial hearings for serious offences: Even for indictable offences (the most serious category), the Magistrates' Court handles the first administrative hearing. During this hearing, magistrates may grant or refuse bail, impose reporting restrictions, and make other preliminary decisions before transferring the case to the Crown Court.
Ancillary matters: The court deals with various administrative matters throughout criminal proceedings, including issuing bench arrest warrants and making decisions about bail for defendants charged with summary or triable-either-way offences.
Youth Court: The Magistrates' Court operates a specialised Youth Court to try cases involving defendants aged between 10 and 17 years old.
Jurisdiction of the Crown Court
The Crown Court was established in 1971 to handle criminal cases that cannot be fully tried in the Magistrates' Courts. This court deals exclusively with the most serious category of offences.
Cases handled by the Crown Court
The Crown Court has jurisdiction over indictable offences, which are the most serious and complex crimes. Key examples include murder, manslaughter, robbery, and Section 18 wounding/grievous bodily harm (GBH).
Beyond trying serious offences, the Crown Court also handles appeals against convictions or sentences from the Magistrates' Court, and deals with cases transferred from the Magistrates' Court for either trial or sentencing when the lower court's powers are insufficient.
Trial procedure in the Crown Court
Criminal trials in the Crown Court typically begin with a plea and case management hearing. At this hearing, the defendant must enter a plea:
If the defendant pleads guilty, the court will proceed to sentencing. The judge may request pre-sentence reports to help determine an appropriate sentence.
If the defendant pleads not guilty, a full trial will commence. Crown Court trials involve a jury of 12 citizens who will hear the evidence and determine whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty of the charges.
The jury system is a fundamental feature of Crown Court trials. The jury is responsible for determining questions of fact (what happened), while the judge directs them on questions of law (how the law applies). This separation ensures that serious criminal cases are judged by the defendant's peers.
The Crown Court has much greater sentencing powers than the Magistrates' Court, with authority to impose sentences up to the maximum set for each specific offence by either common law or statute.
Classification of criminal offences
Understanding how criminal offences are classified is essential because the classification determines which court will hear the case and what procedures apply. There are three distinct categories of criminal offences:
Critical Concept: The Three-Tier Classification System
The classification of a criminal offence is fundamental to understanding the entire criminal process. This classification determines:
- Which court has jurisdiction to hear the case
- What procedural rules apply
- What sentencing powers are available
- Whether the defendant has a right to jury trial
Summary offences
Summary offences are the least serious category of criminal offences in terms of injury caused or societal impact. These offences are always tried in the Magistrates' Court and never progress to the Crown Court for trial.
Common examples include common assault and driving-related offences such as driving without insurance or driving without a valid licence.
Because these offences are less serious, the sentencing powers are correspondingly limited. Magistrates can impose up to six months' imprisonment for a single summary offence, or up to 12 months total for multiple offences, along with fines typically capped at £5,000.
Indictable offences
Indictable offences represent the most serious and complex category of criminal offences. These cases are tried only in the Crown Court, where more substantial sentencing powers and full jury trials are available.
Examples of indictable offences include murder, manslaughter, robbery, and Section 18 wounding/GBH (the more serious form of grievous bodily harm requiring proof of intent).
Although indictable offences must be tried in the Crown Court, they still have an initial administrative hearing in the Magistrates' Court. This ensures consistent first contact with the criminal justice system for all defendants, regardless of offence severity. During this brief hearing, magistrates handle preliminary matters before immediately transferring the case to the Crown Court to be dealt with by a Circuit Judge.
The Crown Court can impose sentences up to the maximum specified for each offence, which for the most serious crimes can mean life imprisonment.
Triable-either-way offences
Triable-either-way offences fall between summary and indictable offences in terms of seriousness. As the name suggests, these offences can be tried in either the Crown Court or the Magistrates' Court.
Examples include theft, Section 20 wounding/GBH (the less serious form requiring no proof of intent), and assault occasioning actual bodily harm (ABH).
The decision about where to try these cases involves both the magistrates and the defendant. Through a process called plea before venue, magistrates first ask the defendant how they plead. Then a decision is made about which court should hear the trial. Defendants may prefer the Crown Court for various reasons, including the availability of a jury trial. However, magistrates may decide that their sentencing powers are insufficient and decline jurisdiction, sending the case to the Crown Court.
When triable-either-way offences are dealt with in the Magistrates' Court, the sentencing is subject to the magistrates' limited powers. However, if magistrates later decide their powers are insufficient after hearing the case, they can commit the defendant to the Crown Court for sentencing.
Pre-trial procedures
The procedures that occur before a trial begins vary depending on the classification of the offence. Understanding these procedures is important for comprehending how cases progress through the criminal justice system.
Procedures for summary offences
Most trials for summary offences in the Magistrates' Court begin with a first appearance at trial. However, the court may need to adjourn the trial and set bail in several circumstances.
An adjournment might be necessary if the CPS requires additional time to gather evidence and prepare their case. Similarly, if the defendant is unprepared and wishes to obtain legal representation from a solicitor, the court will allow time for this.
Pre-sentence reports are valuable tools in the sentencing process. When a defendant pleads guilty, magistrates may request these reports, typically prepared by the probation service. They provide information about the defendant's background and circumstances to help determine an appropriate sentence that balances punishment with rehabilitation.
If the defendant pleads not guilty and wishes to proceed to trial, an adjournment may be needed to arrange for witnesses to attend court and give evidence.
Procedures for triable-either-way offences
The pre-trial process for triable-either-way offences involves the crucial plea before venue procedure. Magistrates will first ask the defendant whether they plead guilty or not guilty to the charges.
Following the defendant's plea, a decision must be made about which court should hear the case. This decision-making process involves consideration of factors such as the seriousness of the specific offence, the defendant's preference, and whether the magistrates' sentencing powers would be adequate if the defendant were convicted.
If the case proceeds in the Magistrates' Court, it will follow similar procedures to summary offences. If transferred to the Crown Court, it will follow the Crown Court procedures including a plea and case management hearing.
Worked Example: Plea Before Venue Process
Consider a defendant charged with theft (a triable-either-way offence):
Step 1: The defendant appears in the Magistrates' Court Step 2: Magistrates ask the defendant to indicate their plea Step 3: If the defendant pleads guilty, magistrates proceed to sentence (or commit to Crown Court if their powers are insufficient) Step 4: If the defendant pleads not guilty, magistrates decide whether to accept jurisdiction based on the seriousness of the case Step 5: If magistrates accept jurisdiction, the defendant can choose between Magistrates' Court trial or Crown Court trial with jury Step 6: The case proceeds in the chosen court
Procedures for indictable offences
For indictable offences, the pre-trial process is more straightforward but still involves the Magistrates' Court initially. After an early administrative hearing in the Magistrates' Court to deal with matters such as bail and legal representation, the case is sent immediately to the Crown Court.
The Crown Court will then schedule a plea and case management hearing, where the case will be dealt with by a Circuit Judge. This hearing sets the framework for how the trial will proceed, including setting dates and dealing with any preliminary legal arguments.
Appeals from criminal courts
The criminal justice system provides various routes of appeal to ensure that defendants (and in some cases, the prosecution) can challenge decisions they believe to be wrong. The available appeal routes depend on which court made the original decision.
Appeals from the Magistrates' Court to the Crown Court
This appeal route is available only to defendants, not to the prosecution. A defendant can appeal against their sentence, their conviction, or both.
When hearing such appeals, the Crown Court sits with a panel consisting of one Circuit Judge and two lay magistrates. This composition combines professional legal expertise with lay participation.
The appeal hearing is a rehearing of the case rather than simply a review of the Magistrates' Court proceedings. The Crown Court can examine the evidence afresh and reach its own conclusions.
Possible outcomes of appeals to the Crown Court:
- Quash (overturn) the original decision - the appeal succeeds
- Confirm the appeal was unsuccessful - the original decision stands
- Remit (send back) the case to the Magistrates' Court with directions on how to proceed
Further appeals: Generally, there is no further right of appeal from this route. However, in exceptional circumstances, it may be possible to appeal to the Queen's Bench Divisional Court, but only on a point of law. From there, a further appeal to the Supreme Court might be possible in cases of significant public importance.
Case stated appeals to the Queen's Bench Divisional Court
This alternative appeal route from the Magistrates' Court is available to both the prosecution and the defence, but only on specific grounds.
Critical Limitation: Point of Law Only
A case stated appeal can only be brought on a point of law. This means the appellant must argue that the magistrates made an error in their understanding or application of the law, rather than simply disagreeing with their factual findings or the severity of the sentence. This is a significant restriction on the appeal right.
The appeal is heard by a panel of two or three High Court Judges, which may include a judge from the Court of Appeal. These senior judges review the legal arguments and the magistrates' reasoning.
Possible outcomes: The Queen's Bench Divisional Court has similar powers to the Crown Court in appeals. It may quash the original decision, confirm that the appeal fails, or remit the case back to the Magistrates' Court with directions about how to proceed.
Further appeals: Both the prosecution and defence can potentially appeal from the Queen's Bench Divisional Court to the Supreme Court. However, this is only possible on a point of law of general public importance - meaning the legal issue must have broader significance beyond just the individual case. Additionally, either the Supreme Court or the Queen's Bench Divisional Court must grant leave to appeal (permission to appeal) before the case can proceed to the Supreme Court.
Key Points to Remember:
-
The criminal courts system consists of two courts of first instance: the Magistrates' Court and the Crown Court, with the choice determined primarily by offence seriousness.
-
Approximately 97% of criminal cases begin in the Magistrates' Court, with over 90% being concluded there without proceeding to a higher court.
-
Criminal offences are classified into three categories: summary offences (least serious, tried in Magistrates' Court), indictable offences (most serious, tried in Crown Court), and triable-either-way offences (intermediate seriousness, can be tried in either court).
-
The Crown Prosecution Service makes the decision whether to prosecute a defendant when there is sufficient evidence.
-
Two main appeal routes exist from the Magistrates' Court: appeals to the Crown Court (defence only, against conviction and/or sentence) and case stated appeals to the Queen's Bench Divisional Court (both parties, on points of law only).