Further rebellion, 1069-75 (AQA GCSE History): Revision Notes
Further rebellion, 1069-75
The period between 1069 and 1075 marked a crucial phase in William's conquest of England. Despite his victory at Hastings, opposition to Norman rule persisted across the country, leading to several major uprisings that tested William's ability to maintain control over his new kingdom.
The uprising in York, 1069
The troubles began in early 1069 when William appointed Robert de Comines as the new Earl of northern Northumbria. This Norman appointment proved deeply unpopular with the local population, who saw it as another example of foreign rule being imposed upon them.
In January 1069, tensions reached breaking point. The appointment of de Comines triggered a violent rebellion in Durham, where local men killed both the new earl and his followers. This act of defiance sent shockwaves through the Norman administration and demonstrated that resistance to William's rule remained strong in the north.
The killing of Robert de Comines was particularly significant because it showed that even William's appointed officials were not safe from Anglo-Saxon resistance. This early rebellion set the pattern for the sustained opposition that would challenge Norman rule throughout this period.
The situation deteriorated further in February 1069 when a major uprising erupted in York itself. The governor and Norman troops stationed there were killed by rebels, while Edgar Ætheling - the Anglo-Saxon claimant to the throne - arrived from Scotland to support the rebellion. The Norman sheriff and his garrison came under severe attack as the city erupted in violence.
William's response was swift and decisive. He raced north with a large army, quickly ending the rebellion through superior military force. The king then demonstrated his authority by building new castles throughout York and the surrounding area before returning south for Easter to celebrate his victory as England's undisputed king.
The Danish attack on York, September 1069
Just as William appeared to have secured the north, a new and far more serious threat emerged from across the North Sea. King Sweyn of Denmark launched a major invasion of England, sending a large fleet to support English rebels and potentially claim the throne for himself.
The Danish invasion force was substantial and well-organized. They linked up with Edgar Ætheling, creating a formidable alliance between foreign invaders and domestic rebels. On 21st September 1069, this combined Anglo-Danish force launched a devastating attack on York, killing approximately Normans and seizing control of the city.
The success of this attack created a crisis for William's rule. The Danes and their English allies controlled York, while new rebellions began erupting in Devon, Shrewsbury, and Chester. This represented the most serious challenge to Norman authority since Hastings, with William's forces stretched across multiple regions.
However, the Danes' strategy was ultimately defensive rather than expansionist. Rather than pressing their advantage, they retreated to the Lincolnshire coast and waited, protected by marshland. This hesitation gave William the breathing space he needed to formulate a comprehensive response.
William's three-part solution
Faced with this multi-front crisis, William developed a sophisticated strategy that combined diplomacy, military action, and psychological warfare. His approach demonstrated both his tactical flexibility and his understanding of the different motivations driving his enemies.
Paying the Danes to leave England was William's first and most pragmatic solution. Rather than engaging in a costly and uncertain military campaign against the invasion force, he negotiated directly with the Danish leaders. This diplomatic approach successfully convinced the Danes to abandon their English allies and return to Denmark, removing the most serious external threat to Norman rule.
Strategic Example: William's Diplomatic Success
William's negotiation with the Danes demonstrated masterful crisis management:
- Problem: Large Danish invasion force allied with English rebels
- Traditional response: Costly military campaign with uncertain outcome
- William's solution: Direct negotiation and payment to Danish leaders
- Result: Danes abandoned their English allies and returned home, eliminating the external threat without bloodshed
The Harrying of the North represented William's most brutal response to rebellion. This systematic campaign of destruction targeted the northern regions that had supported the uprising. Norman forces burned villages, destroyed crops, and killed livestock across Yorkshire and surrounding areas, creating widespread famine and devastation that would last for years.
A symbolic show of power completed William's strategy. He had his crown sent to York and wore it during Christmas celebrations in the city, demonstrating that Norman rule was firmly established even in previously rebellious territories. This gesture sent a clear message that William's authority extended throughout his kingdom.
Hereward the Wake and the rebellion at Ely
Around 1069, another significant challenge emerged in the form of Hereward the Wake, an Anglo-Saxon noble who had returned from exile to find his lands given to a Norman lord. This personal grievance sparked what would become one of the most sustained rebellions against Norman rule.
In 1070, when the Danes returned and established a base at Ely, Hereward joined forces with them to launch a raid on Peterborough Abbey. The rebels hoped to save the monastery's treasures from Norman hands, but the Danes seized everything and returned to Denmark with their loot, leaving Hereward to continue the fight alone.
Morcar, the former Anglo-Saxon Earl of Northumbria, escaped Norman custody and joined Hereward's rebellion at Ely. Together, they defended the Isle of Ely using the surrounding marshland as natural fortification. This rebellion posed a serious challenge because it was based in easily defensible terrain and led by experienced Anglo-Saxon nobles.
The rebellion at Ely was particularly significant because it represented one of the last stands of the Anglo-Saxon nobility. The use of marshland as a defensive position showed the rebels' tactical awareness and made the rebellion more difficult for William to crush quickly.
Eventually, Norman persistence and superior resources proved decisive. The rebels were defeated, and Morcar was captured while Hereward escaped into legend. The rebellion's failure marked the end of major Anglo-Saxon noble resistance to Norman rule.
The revolt of the earls, 1075
The final major challenge to William's authority came not from Anglo-Saxon rebels or foreign invaders, but from within the Norman establishment itself. In 1075, Roger, Earl of Hereford (son of William's friend William FitzOsbern), grew angry at his reduced influence and status under Norman rule.
Roger formed a conspiracy with Ralph de Gael, another Norman earl, and surprisingly gained the support of Waltheof, an English earl. This alliance between Norman and Anglo-Saxon nobles represented a new type of threat - one that came from the very people William had appointed to help govern England.
The rebellion was supported by the Danes, who saw an opportunity to exploit Norman divisions. However, William's response demonstrated how much stronger his position had become since 1069. The king was able to defeat the rebellion entirely, with Waltheof joining the conspiracy too late to make any meaningful contribution.
The swift defeat of this revolt had severe consequences for its leaders. Roger and Ralph lost their lands, while Waltheof was executed. This harsh punishment sent a clear message that William would tolerate no disloyalty, even from his own appointees.
Timeline of major events
- January 1069: Robert de Comines killed in Durham, triggering northern rebellion
- February 1069: Uprising in York; Edgar Ætheling joins rebels; William crushes rebellion
- September 1069: Danish invasion; Normans killed in York
- 1069-70: William implements three-part solution - pays Danes, harries the North, shows power
- 1070: Hereward and Danes raid Peterborough Abbey
- 1070-71: Hereward's rebellion at Ely continues; Morcar joins and is eventually captured
- 1072: Edgar Ætheling's unsuccessful attempt to invade from Scotland
- 1075: Revolt of the Earls - final major rebellion defeated; Waltheof executed
Key Points to Remember:
-
Opposition persisted for years - William faced continuous rebellions from 1069-75, showing that the Norman Conquest was a gradual process, not a single event
-
Multiple types of enemies - William dealt with Anglo-Saxon rebels, Danish invaders, and even disloyal Norman earls, requiring different strategies for each threat
-
Brutal but effective responses - The Harrying of the North was devastating but eliminated northern resistance; paying the Danes was pragmatic and successful
-
Strategic use of power - William combined military force, diplomacy, and symbolic gestures (like wearing his crown in York) to establish authority
-
Growing Norman strength - By 1075, William could easily defeat rebellions that might have succeeded in 1069, showing how his control had strengthened over time