The Battle of Hastings (AQA GCSE History): Revision Notes
The Battle of Hastings
The Battle of Hastings was fought on 14 October 1066 between the Norman army led by William of Normandy and the English army under King Harold Godwinson. This decisive battle would determine the future of England and marked the beginning of Norman rule.
The Battle of Hastings is considered one of the most significant battles in English history, as it fundamentally changed the political, cultural, and linguistic landscape of England for centuries to come.
Military forces and tactics
Understanding the different types of soldiers and tactics used by both sides is crucial to understanding how the battle unfolded. The mediaeval battlefield was dominated by three main types of forces: infantry, cavalry, and archers, each with distinct advantages and vulnerabilities.
Key military terms
Housecarls were highly trained professional soldiers who served as bodyguards to important lords like King Harold. These elite warriors formed the backbone of the English army and were skilled in close combat with their feared two-handed axes.
The fyrd consisted of ordinary working men, mostly peasants, who were called up to serve the king during times of war. While not as well-trained as housecarls, they could be quickly replaced after battles, giving the English army flexibility in prolonged campaigns.
The fyrd system was unique to Anglo-Saxon England and represented one of the earliest forms of organised militia service in mediaeval Europe. Every free man was expected to serve when called upon by their lord.
Shield wall was a crucial defensive formation where soldiers linked their shields together to create a protective barrier. This tactic was particularly effective because men from the same area knew each other well and could coordinate their movements.
Feigned retreat was a clever Norman tactic where soldiers would pretend to flee in panic, encouraging the enemy to break formation and chase them. Once the enemy was scattered, the Normans could turn around and destroy the isolated groups.
Mercenaries were professional soldiers who fought for payment rather than loyalty to a particular lord. William's army included many of these fighters from across Europe.
The feigned retreat was one of the most sophisticated military tactics of the mediaeval period and required exceptional discipline and coordination to execute successfully. Many armies attempted this tactic but failed due to poor communication or genuine panic.
Comparing the armies
The armies at Hastings represented two very different military traditions: the continental European model of combined arms warfare versus the traditional Anglo-Saxon system of infantry-based defence.
Norman knights versus English housecarls
The Norman knights represented the elite heavy cavalry of mediaeval warfare. They wore extensive armour and rode powerful warhorses, allowing them to deliver devastating charges that could smash through enemy lines. Their height advantage on horseback gave them significant reach over foot soldiers.
However, horses were vulnerable targets, and if Norman knights were forced to fight on foot, they lost many of their advantages. The effectiveness of cavalry charges was also limited when facing uphill terrain.
Mediaeval warhorses were specially bred and trained for battle. These destriers, as they were called, could cost as much as a small farm and represented a significant investment for their owners.
English housecarls, while fighting on foot, were incredibly disciplined and experienced warriors. Their shield wall formation was extremely difficult to break when properly maintained, and their two-handed axes could cause terrible damage to both horses and riders. They understood how to fight as a coordinated unit rather than as individuals.
The main weakness of housecarls was their vulnerability to archery and cavalry attacks if their shield wall was broken or if they were caught in the open.
Norman foot soldiers versus English fyrd
William's foot soldiers included a mix of Norman infantry and mercenaries from various parts of Europe. They were generally better equipped than the English fyrd, with many having light armour and professional training. The Norman archers and crossbowmen provided crucial ranged support that the English lacked.
The English fyrd were brave but poorly equipped civilians who fought with whatever weapons they could find - clubs, axes, scythes, and pitchforks. While their local knowledge and determination were valuable, they lacked the training and equipment to match professional soldiers.
Harold had no archers in his army, putting the English at a severe disadvantage in the initial phases of battle. This tactical oversight would prove costly as the battle progressed.
The battle sequence
The battle lasted approximately eight hours, which was unusually long for a mediaeval conflict. This extended duration occurred because the two armies were quite evenly matched, leading to several distinct phases.
Battle Timeline: The Six Phases of Hastings
Phase 1 - Opening Archery (Morning): Norman archers attack uphill against English shields Phase 2 - Infantry Assaults (Mid-morning): Repeated charges against the shield wall Phase 3 - Crisis Point (Midday): Rumours of William's death cause Norman panic Phase 4 - Feigned Retreats (Afternoon): Tactical withdrawals break English formation Phase 5 - Shield Wall Collapse (Late afternoon): English line finally breaks Phase 6 - Final Stand (Evening): Harold's death ends English resistance
Opening phase: The battle began with Norman archers attacking the English position on the ridge. However, the English had taken the high ground, forcing William's men to attack uphill. The English shield wall initially held firm against these early assaults.
Infantry attacks: William's foot soldiers and knights made repeated charges against the English line. The English housecarls used their axes effectively, causing significant casualties among the Norman horses and riders. The shield wall remained largely intact during this phase.
The turning point: At one point, panic spread through the Norman ranks when rumours circulated that William had been killed. To prove he was still alive, William lifted his helmet and showed his face to his troops, restoring their morale and preventing a complete retreat.
Mediaeval battles were heavily dependent on the survival and visibility of commanders. The death or perceived death of a leader could cause an entire army to flee, regardless of their tactical position.
Feigned retreat: The Normans then employed their famous feigned retreat tactic. They pretended to flee in disorder, which tempted some English soldiers to break ranks and pursue them. This decision weakened the English line and allowed Norman cavalry to isolate and destroy these scattered groups.
Shield wall collapse: As the battle progressed, the English shield wall gradually thinned out due to casualties and the pursuit of retreating Normans. Norman knights were eventually able to break through the weakened formation, causing massive damage as the coordinated defence fell apart.
Final phase: Harold and his brothers, Gyrth and Leofwine, along with their remaining housecarls, made their final stand at the top of the hill. They fought to the death, with Harold and both his brothers being killed in the fighting. With their king dead, the rest of the English army finally broke and fled.
The death of Harold Godwinson was not just a personal tragedy but a political catastrophe. In mediaeval warfare, the death of a king on the battlefield typically meant the immediate end of organised resistance.
Consequences and significance
The death of Harold Godwinson at Hastings ended Anglo-Saxon rule in England and began the Norman Conquest. William's victory was not just due to superior tactics but also the accumulated effects of Harold's previous battles against Harald Hardrada at Stamford Bridge, which had weakened the English army.
The battle demonstrated the importance of combined arms tactics (using archers, infantry, and cavalry together) and showed how discipline and coordination could overcome individual bravery. The Norman success also highlighted the vulnerability of traditional Anglo-Saxon military organisation to professional continental warfare methods.
The Norman Conquest brought significant changes to England, including new architectural styles, administrative systems, and the introduction of Norman French, which would heavily influence the development of the English language.
Timeline of key events
- September 1066: Harold defeats Harald Hardrada at Stamford Bridge
- 28 September 1066: William lands at Pevensey
- 14 October 1066: Battle of Hastings fought
- Morning: Norman archers attack English positions
- Midday: Infantry and cavalry assaults on shield wall
- Afternoon: Feigned retreat tactics begin to work
- Evening: Harold killed, English army collapses
- 25 December 1066: William crowned King of England
Key Points to Remember:
-
The battle lasted eight hours - unusually long for mediaeval warfare, showing how evenly matched the armies were initially
-
High ground advantage - Harold's decision to fight on the ridge gave the English initial defensive benefits but limited their tactical options
-
Shield wall effectiveness - The English defensive formation was highly effective until it began to break down due to casualties and undisciplined pursuit
-
Combined arms victory - William's success came from coordinating archers, infantry, and cavalry rather than relying on any single type of unit
-
Leadership mattered - Harold's death ended English resistance, while William's survival of the panic moment was crucial to Norman victory