War and Just War theory (AQA GCSE Religious Studies A): Revision Notes
War and Just War theory
Understanding war and its justification
War represents a serious state of armed conflict that occurs between different countries or groups of people. Within Christian thinking, the concept of a just war has developed - this refers to a war that Christians believe is fought for morally acceptable reasons and conducted in the right way.
The term "just war" specifically refers to conflicts that meet certain moral criteria established by Christian thinkers, distinguishing them from wars fought purely for power, revenge, or material gain.
The tension between war and Christian teachings about peace has led to complex discussions within Christianity about when, if ever, violence might be justified. This has resulted in the development of Just War theory, which provides a framework for evaluating whether a particular conflict meets certain moral criteria.
Why wars happen
Understanding the root causes of war helps us examine whether conflicts might meet the criteria for being considered 'just'. There are eight main reasons why wars typically occur:
Resource-based conflicts often stem from greed, where nations or groups seek to gain control over valuable resources, territory, or economic advantages. Self-defence represents another common cause, when a country or group responds to being attacked by others.
Retaliation drives conflicts where one side launches a counterattack or seeks revenge for previous wrongs. Wars may also arise from competition over economic and natural resources such as water, land, oil, or other valuable materials that are essential for survival or prosperity.
Fear can motivate preemptive action, where one side attacks first because they believe someone else is planning to attack them. National pride may lead to conflicts when groups fight to protect their cultural identity, values, or way of life.
Some wars are fought with the stated aim of fighting against injustice and aggression, attempting to stop wrongdoing or oppression. Finally, protecting people can justify conflict when it's seen as necessary to defend vulnerable populations from harm.
Biblical teachings on war and conflict
The Bible contains various passages that Christians interpret when considering issues of war and peace. One significant Old Testament passage provides important context for understanding Christian thinking about conflict:
Biblical Perspective on Justice (Exodus 21:23-25):
"But if there is serious injury, you are to take life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burn for burn, wound for wound, bruise for bruise."
Many Christians understand this passage as intended to limit the extent of revenge taken, rather than to actively promote the taking of revenge. It represents a principle of proportional justice rather than encouraging escalation of violence.
However, other Christian teachings, particularly those found in the New Testament, emphasise ideas of peace. For example, Matthew 5:9 promotes peace-making, especially through following the example of Jesus Christ. This creates a tension within Christian thought between Old Testament concepts of proportional justice and New Testament teachings about forgiveness and peace.
At various points in biblical history, God is recorded as instructing the Jewish people to attack those who opposed them, which some Christians interpret as divine approval for certain conflicts under specific circumstances.
Just War theory criteria
The Just War theory provides a framework that largely Christian thinkers have developed to help those in authority decide whether a particular war can be considered morally justified. This theory doesn't encourage war but rather seeks to prevent unjustified conflicts by establishing clear moral boundaries.
The Six Essential Criteria for Just War:
For a war to be considered 'just' according to this theory, it must meet all of these strict criteria:
- Reasonable chance of success - launching a hopeless conflict that will only cause suffering without achieving anything positive would be wrong
- Ultimate aim must be to bring about peace - not simply to cause destruction or gain power
- Last resort after non-violent methods - violence should be genuinely the final option
- Protection of innocent civilians - no deliberate killing of non-combatants
- Just cause - for example, resisting aggression or protecting innocent people from serious harm
- Fair and proportional methods - excessive force or cruel tactics make even justified causes unjust
Christian church positions
The Catholic Church has formally adopted the Just War theory, with the doctrine appearing in the 1992 Catechism of the Catholic Church. Many other Christian denominations have also accepted this framework as a way of thinking about when war might be morally justified.
There appears to be some biblical support for Just War thinking, and many Christians believe it is right for countries to maintain armed forces to protect their citizens. Sometimes violence is seen as necessary - for example, if a country is invaded, many Christians would argue that the people of that country should be allowed to defend themselves.
Historical Development of Just War Theory:
The idea of just war has ancient roots, first being formulated by St Augustine in the early centuries of Christianity. Later, Thomas Aquinas developed these ideas further, creating a more systematic set of criteria that forms the basis of modern Just War theory.
Different Christian viewpoints
Not all Christians agree about whether war can ever be justified. This represents one of the significant areas of disagreement within Christian thinking about ethical issues.
Some Christians fully accept Just War theory, believing that under certain carefully defined circumstances, war can be morally acceptable and even necessary to prevent greater evils or protect innocent people.
However, other Christians feel that both sides in any war typically claim their cause is just, making it difficult to apply Just War criteria objectively. These Christians often prefer to focus on biblical teachings relating to peace, forgiveness, and non-violence.
Some Christians embrace pacifist positions, arguing that Jesus's teachings about loving enemies and turning the other cheek mean that violence is never acceptable for his followers. They point to New Testament teachings that seem to reject retaliation and promote peaceful responses to conflict.
This diversity of opinion reflects the complexity of trying to apply ancient religious teachings to modern situations involving warfare, international relations, and the protection of human rights.
Key Points to Remember:
- War is armed conflict between groups, while 'just war' refers to conflict fought for morally acceptable reasons using ethical methods
- The eight main causes of war include greed, self-defence, retaliation, resource competition, fear, national pride, fighting injustice, and protecting people
- Biblical teachings create tension between Old Testament concepts of proportional justice (Exodus 21:23-25) and New Testament emphasis on peace and forgiveness
- Just War theory requires six criteria to be met: reasonable chance of success, aim for peace, last resort after non-violence fails, protection of civilians, just cause, and fair methods
- Christians disagree about war - some accept Just War theory while others prefer pacifist approaches based on Jesus's teachings about peace and love