Dealing With International Crime (HSC SSCE Legal Studies): Revision Notes
Dealing With International Crime
Introduction
Effectively addressing international crime requires a combined approach that integrates both domestic and international measures. The strategies used differ depending on whether the focus is on crimes against the international community or transnational crimes. Successful enforcement depends on cooperation between countries, as criminal activity increasingly crosses national borders.
The distinction between crimes against the international community (such as genocide and war crimes) and transnational crimes (such as drug trafficking and human trafficking) is crucial, as each category requires different enforcement mechanisms and international cooperation frameworks.
Domestic measures
Jurisdictional limitations
Australia faces significant constraints when responding to international crime due to jurisdictional boundaries. These limitations include:
- Australian law enforcement cannot operate in foreign countries without express permission from the host nation
- Australian courts lack jurisdiction over crimes committed under foreign laws in other territories
- Australian parliaments cannot legislate on the laws of other countries
Without cooperation from foreign governments, Australia's legal system has limited capacity to respond to international crimes. However, specific exceptions exist in certain circumstances:
- Where express permission has been granted for Australian law enforcement presence (such as crisis relief operations)
- Where parliament legislates on actions involving Australian residents abroad (for example, child sex tourism laws)
- Where courts claim rare jurisdiction under international law rules (such as universal jurisdiction for certain grave crimes)
These jurisdictional limitations explain why international cooperation is not just beneficial but absolutely essential for effectively combating international crime. No single nation can adequately address these crimes operating in isolation.
Despite these limitations, Australia has implemented numerous important domestic measures to combat international crime.
Crimes against the international community
Rome Statute ratification
The most significant development in Australia's approach to crimes against the international community was signing and ratifying the Rome Statute. Australia demonstrated strong commitment by becoming one of the first signatories on December , and ratified the statute on July (the date the statute entered into force internationally).
Legislative framework
Prior to the Rome Statute, Australia had already criminalised several recognised crimes against the international community through:
- War Crimes Act 1945 (Cth) – addressed war crimes from the Second World War period
- Geneva Conventions Act 1957 (Cth) – outlawed recognised war crimes listed in the Geneva Conventions
To ensure compliance with the Rome Statute, the federal government passed two key pieces of legislation coinciding with ratification:
International Criminal Court Act 2002 (Cth) and International Criminal Court (Consequential Amendments) Act 2002 (Cth). This legislation introduced:
- Procedural amendments to support ICC cooperation
- A new section to the Commonwealth Criminal Code: Chapter 8 – Offences against Humanity and Related Offences
- Domestic offences in Australia for all crimes listed in the Rome Statute
- Integration of existing offences (such as war crimes from the Geneva Conventions Act )
Consequence of Rome Statute Implementation
Any crime against the international community prohibited by the Rome Statute is now also criminalised within Australia. The ICC functions as a court of last resort, complementing rather than replacing national criminal justice systems. Australia maintains primary jurisdiction to investigate and prosecute such crimes occurring in Australian territory or involving Australian citizens.
Australia's role as state party to ICC
Australia actively participates in ICC operations by:
- Engaging in discussions among state parties
- Contributing to court administration
- Meeting reporting requirements (the Commonwealth Attorney-General must report annually on ICC operations and impacts on Australia's legal system)
According to the Attorney-General's Department report for –, there have been no Australian prosecutions under the Act, and the ICC has had "no discernible impact" on Australia's legal system to date.
Transnational crime
The Australian Government has significantly expanded efforts to combat rising transnational crimes through multiple agencies and measures.
Australian Federal Police (AFP)
Key Definition: Australian Federal Police (AFP)
The Australian Federal Police (AFP) was established under the Australian Federal Police Act (Cth) to enforce Commonwealth criminal law and protect Australia's interests from crime domestically and overseas. The AFP works closely with law enforcement bodies at state, territory, Commonwealth and international levels.
Role expansion: The AFP's international role has grown considerably with the rise in transnational crime, including:
- Posts in more than countries worldwide
- Deployment of Australian police for international capacity-building
- Monitoring and peacekeeping operations
- Specialist training for international law enforcement agencies to prevent transnational crimes at source
- Encouraging greater international cooperation
Key international operations:
- Child protection – combating child exploitation networks
- Terrorism operations – investigating and preventing terrorist activities
- Human trafficking – stopping trafficking networks
- Drug operations – disrupting international drug trade
Case Study: Bali Bombings Investigation
The Jakarta Regional Cooperation Team assisted Indonesian police to investigate and arrest suspects of the Bali bombings, as well as the bombings of the Australian Embassy and Marriott Hotel in Jakarta in and respectively.
This operation demonstrates the effectiveness of international cooperation between law enforcement agencies, where the AFP provided crucial technical assistance and investigative support to Indonesian authorities.
Jakarta Centre for Law Enforcement Cooperation: Established by the AFP to enhance regional law enforcement skills for dealing with transnational crime. Over participants have completed programmes covering skills including:
- Criminal intelligence
- Forensics
- Financial investigations
The AFP continues developing relationships with regional bodies such as the South East Asian Regional Center for Counter-Terrorism (Kuala Lumpur) and the International Law Enforcement Academy (Bangkok).
Commonwealth Attorney-General's Department
The Attorney-General's Department plays varied but crucial roles regarding transnational crimes:
- Reports and provides advice on Australia's compliance with international obligations
- Oversees operation of legislation relating to transnational crimes
- Provides advice on implementation of laws
- Provides information to the public and parliament on Australia's efforts against transnational crime
Australian Crime Commission (ACC)
The Australian Crime Commission (ACC) is a national statutory body established under the Australian Crime Commission Act (Cth) to combat serious and organised crime. The ACC investigates matters of national concern and coordinates with international law enforcement agencies, delivering specialist capabilities to assist in investigating and analysing intelligence concerning national and transnational crimes.
Key focus areas:
According to the ACC's report Organised Crime in Australia, most significant organised crime groups operating in Australia have an international dimension. The ACC specifically investigates:
- South East Asian organised crime (primary point of heroin into Australia)
- Money laundering and tax fraud
- Identity crime
- Human trafficking for sexual exploitation
Australian Customs and Border Protection Service
This national agency is responsible for the security and integrity of Australian borders. The agency works closely with other government and international agencies to detect and deter unlawful movement of goods or people across Australia's borders.
Australian High Tech Crime Centre (AHTCC)
Created in , the Australian High Tech Crime Centre (AHTCC) coordinates all Australian law enforcement authorities in fighting serious crimes involving technology. Now part of the AFP's High Tech Crime Operations, its main functions include:
- Coordinating a national approach to serious, complex and multi-jurisdictional crimes
- Assisting all Australian jurisdictions in dealing with high-tech crime
The AHTCC has representatives from every Australian jurisdiction and receives funding from all states and territories.
State bodies
Numerous state and territory bodies investigate transnational crimes due to their cross-jurisdictional nature. In NSW, these include:
- Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC)
- NSW Crime Commission
- Police Integrity Commission
- Divisions within the NSW Police Service
Intelligence sharing and cooperation between national, state and territory bodies is essential in combating transnational crimes effectively. Without this coordination, criminals can exploit gaps between jurisdictions to avoid detection and prosecution.
Human trafficking: a case study
Human trafficking represents a very serious transnational crime issue. It involves moving people by force, coercion or deceptive means, often trafficking women and children into the sex industry. The global trade in people is complex and difficult to eradicate, with estimates suggesting between to victims annually. In the last decade, over matters of trafficking in Australia were referred to the AFP.
Australian Government response
Since , the Australian Government has introduced numerous measures to combat human trafficking:
Legislative measures: Various offences related to human trafficking are found in the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), including:
- Slavery or any commercial transaction involving a slave
- Sexual servitude or deceptive recruiting
- Trafficking in persons and forced labour
Similar legislation has been passed in Australian states and territories.
Financial commitment: About $ million dedicated from to tackling the problem through numerous government bodies.
Comprehensive Approach to Human Trafficking
Australia's response tackles the issue from initial recruitment to eventual reintegration of victims:
- AFP funding to strengthen detection, investigation and specialist training capabilities
- National Policy Strategy to combat trafficking of women for sexual servitude
- Victim support measures and special visa arrangements to support trafficking victims
- Cooperation with regional and international agencies in tackling sources and prosecuting offenders
- Support and training for the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions to help prosecute people trafficking
This multi-faceted approach recognizes that effective response requires addressing all stages of the trafficking process, from prevention to victim rehabilitation.
International measures
International measures aimed at tackling international crime can be divided into three main categories:
- Cooperation between governments through international treaties and international organisations targeted at specific types of international crime
- International courts and tribunals to deal with enforcement of international crimes
- Cooperation and intelligence sharing between national and sub-national agencies to tackle trans-border crime problems
Crimes against the international community
Most international efforts to prevent or prosecute crimes against the international community have involved governments showing continuing commitment and close cooperation in developing international treaties such as the Geneva Conventions and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. These crimes are universally recognised and condemned by the international community.
Courts and tribunals
Prior to the ICC's establishment, crimes were usually dealt with domestically by courts or military tribunals on a case-by-case basis. However, throughout the th century, various ad hoc international tribunals were established to prosecute atrocities relating to particular events:
Historical examples:
- Nuremberg trials – prosecuted crimes against humanity and war crimes relating to the Second World War
- Tokyo trials – prosecuted similar crimes in relation to Japan's wartime conduct
- International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) – established in by the UN Security Council to investigate and prosecute individuals for war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide committed during the Yugoslav conflict between and
International Criminal Court operations
Since , the ICC has launched investigations and prosecutions into numerous recent events. By , the following situations had been referred to the ICC:
- The situation in Uganda
- The situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
- The situation in Darfur, Sudan
- The situation in the Central African Republic
- The situation in the Republic of Kenya
Some state parties have requested investigations into internal matters, and at least one matter has been referred to the court by the UN Security Council.
Extradition treaties
Key Definition: Extradition
Extradition is the legal surrender of a suspect or convicted criminal by one jurisdiction to another to face criminal charges or sentence. This represents one of the most important tools in fighting international crime.
For example, if a person commits murder in another country and flees to Australia before being caught, they might be extradited back to the original country.
Governance: International extradition is generally governed by a series of bilateral agreements (agreements between two countries). Australia currently has extradition agreements with approximately countries. However, some international agreements have their own specific extradition arrangements, including:
- Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
- Genocide Conventions
Australia has received three extradition requests from the ICTY against people residing in Australia accused of committing war crimes.
Australian legislation: In Australia, extradition is governed by the Extradition Act 1988 (Cth). The Act establishes criteria that must be met before extradition will be granted:
- It must be determined that the accused has a case to answer on the evidence
- The accused must be able to receive a fair trial in the state to which they are being returned
- It must be shown that the offence is a crime in both Australia and the target country (principle of dual criminality)
Importance of Extradition
Extradition ensures that offenders cannot simply flee the jurisdiction where the offence was committed to escape prosecution for their crime. Without effective extradition treaties and processes, international borders become safe havens for criminals.
Case Study: Dragan Vasiljkovic
The case of Dragan Vasiljkovic (also known as "Captain Dragan") illustrates issues that may arise under extradition requests for international crimes. Vasiljkovic was commander of a paramilitary unit known as the Red Berets during the ethnic conflict in the Balkans between and .
Background: Croatia wished to question Vasiljkovic regarding allegations including:
- Directing troops to commit the war crime of torture
- Committing the war crime of torture during his time in Srpska Krajina (a Serbian-dominated part of Croatia) until
Legal proceedings:
- In February (year not specified), a Federal Court judge dismissed Vasiljkovic's challenge against a magistrate's finding that he was eligible for surrender to Croatia
- In September, a full bench of the court allowed Vasiljkovic's appeal
- He was released from Sydney's Parklea prison after almost four years in custody
- Croatia appealed to the High Court
Key legal issue: Under section c of Australia's Extradition Act, an accused person can be exempted from extradition if upon surrender to the extradition country "the person may be prejudiced at his or her trial, or punished, detained or restricted in his or her personal liberty, by reason of race, religion, nationality or political opinions".
The Full Federal Court found that Croatia's courts had allowed Croatian soldiers to rely upon their service in the Croatian armed forces during the "homeland war" to mitigate sentences in criminal matters, but Serbian soldiers had not received the same considerations. The court concluded that if convicted, Vasiljkovic might be incarcerated for a longer period than a Croatian counterpart, largely as a consequence of his political beliefs.
Croatia argued that the Federal Court wrongly concluded that Vasiljkovic might receive a longer sentence because of his political beliefs, and that the mitigating factor applied to Croatian soldiers was irrelevant to Vasiljkovic.
This case demonstrates the complexity of extradition law and the balance between international cooperation and protection of human rights.
Transnational crimes
International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL)
Key Definition: INTERPOL
The International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL) is the world's largest international police organisation, with member countries (including Australia) as of the time of publication. INTERPOL was created in to improve transnational cooperation between police worldwide. Its mission is to prevent or combat international crime, with headquarters in Lyon, France.
Six priority crime areas:
- Drugs and criminal organisations
- Public safety and terrorism
- Financial and high-tech crime
- Trafficking in human beings
- Fugitives
- Corruption
Operations: At any given time, INTERPOL engages in numerous worldwide operations investigating and providing advice to national law enforcement agencies on transnational crimes, including:
- Targeting organised crime in Asia and Eurasia
- International counterfeiting and money laundering
- Trafficking in arms and drugs
- International terrorism
Development Towards Global Police Force
There has been recent movement towards developing a "global police force", advocated by INTERPOL in cooperation with the United Nations, to:
- Improve skills of police peacekeepers
- Share communications networks and criminal data
- Increase ability to track criminal movement worldwide by sharing resources and establishing common standards
This development represents a significant evolution in international law enforcement cooperation, moving beyond simple information sharing to coordinated operational capacity.
United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime
The United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime is regarded as the main international instrument in the fight against transnational organised crime. It began operation in and has three protocols that countries become party to once they sign the convention:
Three protocols:
- Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children
- Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Air and Sea
- Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts and Components and Ammunition
State obligations: Signature states commit to:
- Ensuring domestic criminal offences regulate participation in organised crimes, money laundering and other aspects of corruption
- Adopting broad changes to extradition procedures
- Providing "mutual" legal assistance and cooperation between law enforcement agencies
- Upgrading capacity of national authorities to deal with organised transnational crime networks
Pacific Transnational Crime Network (PTCN)
The Pacific Transnational Crime Network (PTCN) was formed in July as a response to increases in regional transnational crime. It was an AFP initiative recognising that strong relationships were needed between Australia and its Pacific neighbours to combat transnational crime. The network's headquarters are located at the Pacific Transnational Crime Coordination Centre in Apia, Samoa.
Purpose: The PTCN, working with the AFP, has created a regional network of transnational crime units in Pacific states focusing on combating cross-border criminal activity such as:
- Drugs and arms smuggling
- Money laundering
Functions: The PTCN manages, coordinates and enhances law enforcement intelligence across the region. Pacific countries have been identified as particularly vulnerable to threats from transnational crime, especially from organised crime groups. Pacific nations may have fewer resources to tackle law enforcement or to detect and prosecute such crimes.
Support provided:
- Technical assistance
- Training
- Resource sharing
- Strengthening the rule of law in Pacific countries
Success Example: Fiji Methamphetamine Laboratory
In , the then largest methamphetamine laboratory in the southern hemisphere was discovered and dismantled in Suva, Fiji. The laboratory posed serious environmental and physical danger to local communities, and the drugs were potentially destined for markets in Australia, New Zealand, Europe and the United States.
This operation demonstrates the effectiveness of regional cooperation through the PTCN framework. Recently, high-profile arrests have been made of Pacific regional figures engaged in immigration, financial fraud and money laundering activities.
Exam guidance
When analysing Australia's response to international crime, examiners typically look for:
For "describe" questions:
- Clear identification of specific domestic measures (legislation, agencies)
- Explanation of jurisdictional limitations
- Reference to specific laws and their purposes
For "assess" or "evaluate" questions:
- Discussion of effectiveness (strengths and limitations)
- Balance between domestic and international measures
- Examples of successes and challenges
- Recognition that cooperation is essential
For "analyse" questions:
- Breaking down the relationship between domestic and international measures
- Examining why certain approaches are needed (jurisdictional limitations)
- Considering multiple perspectives (law enforcement, human rights, sovereignty)
Key Points to Make in Exam Responses:
- Domestic measures alone are insufficient due to jurisdictional limits
- International cooperation is essential for effectiveness
- Both approaches complement each other
- Use specific case studies to illustrate points (Bali bombings, human trafficking, Vasiljkovic case)
Remember!
Key Points to Remember:
-
Combined approach essential: Dealing with international crime requires both domestic and international measures working together, as jurisdiction limits what any single country can achieve alone
-
Australia's domestic response: Includes Rome Statute ratification creating domestic offences, multiple agencies (AFP, ACC, Customs, AHTCC, Attorney-General's Department), and state bodies working through intelligence sharing and coordination
-
International measures critical: Include the ICC as court of last resort, extradition treaties enabling surrender of suspects across borders, and cooperation bodies like INTERPOL ( member countries) and PTCN (Pacific region focus)
-
Human trafficking example: Demonstrates comprehensive approach needed, combining legislation (Criminal Code Act (Cth)), victim support, AFP operations, and international cooperation – with over matters referred to AFP in last decade
-
Jurisdictional limitations: Australian law enforcement cannot operate in foreign countries, courts lack jurisdiction over foreign crimes, and parliament cannot legislate on other countries' laws – making cooperation essential for effectiveness
Key Definitions:
-
Australian Federal Police (AFP): Australia's Commonwealth police force established to enforce Commonwealth criminal law and protect Australia's interests from crime in Australia and overseas
-
Extradition: The legal surrender of a suspect or convicted criminal by one jurisdiction to another to face criminal charges or sentence
-
Bilateral agreement: An agreement between two countries
-
International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL): The world's largest international police organisation established in to facilitate collaboration among intelligence agencies around the world
Critical Frameworks:
-
Rome Statute framework: Creates complementarity principle where ICC acts as court of last resort, with national courts maintaining primary jurisdiction
-
Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) criteria:
- Case to answer on evidence
- Fair trial guarantee
- Dual criminality requirement
-
Three categories of international measures:
- International treaties and organisations
- International courts and tribunals
- Intelligence sharing between agencies