Categories of Crime (HSC SSCE Legal Studies): Revision Notes
Categories of Crime
Crimes in Australia can be classified in multiple ways, and understanding these categories is essential for legal analysis. The classification of an offence determines how it is investigated, prosecuted, and punished. This note examines the various ways crimes are categorized in New South Wales, focusing on types of offences, their seriousness, and the parties involved.
How crimes are categorized
Criminal offences can be classified according to several different criteria, including:
- Type of offence: The nature of the criminal act (e.g., offences against the person, property crimes, drug offences)
- Jurisdiction: Whether the crime falls under NSW or Commonwealth law
- Seriousness: Whether it is classified as a summary or indictable offence
- Parties involved: The role played by individuals in the commission of the crime
Understanding these categories is crucial because they influence procedural aspects such as which court hears the case, what penalties apply, and what rights the accused has during the criminal process.
Strict liability offences
Before examining specific categories, it is important to understand that not all offences require proof of mens rea (guilty mind). Some offences are classified as strict liability offences, where the prosecution only needs to prove the actus reus (guilty act). The accused's intention is irrelevant.
Strict liability applies primarily to minor regulatory offences such as traffic violations or breaches of regulations. Because strict liability reduces the accused's rights by lowering the standard of proof, it is generally restricted to less serious offences.
Strict liability has administrative advantages, such as managing high volumes of traffic offences efficiently and encouraging compliance with important regulations.
Common Strict Liability Offences
In speeding offences, police do not need to prove that a driver intended to break the speed limit—only that they did so. Similarly, selling alcohol to minors is a strict liability offence; it does not matter whether the seller knew the buyer was underage.
In some cases, a defence may be available if the accused can prove the act was an "honest and reasonable mistake."
Types of offences
The Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) divides criminal offences into approximately parts, covering different types of crimes. These are further subdivided into divisions, sections, and subsections. Commonwealth offences follow a similar structure.
Offences against the person
These offences involve harm or injury to an individual. They are divided into three main areas: homicide, assault, and sexual offences.
Homicide
Homicide refers to the unlawful killing of another person. It encompasses both intentional and accidental killings, with varying degrees of mens rea. In homicide cases, causation must be established—the prosecution must prove a substantial link between the accused's actions and the victim's death.
There are four main categories of homicide in NSW:
Murder is the most serious homicide offence, punishable by life imprisonment. To prove murder, the prosecution must establish at least one of the following:
- The accused intended to deliberately kill the victim
- The accused intended to inflict serious bodily harm that resulted in death
- The act was done with reckless indifference to human life (the accused did not care that their actions might end a life)
- The act occurred while committing or attempting another serious crime punishable by life or years' imprisonment
The third element—reckless indifference—is often the most difficult to prove.
Case Study: Boughey v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 10
A doctor strangled his wife during a sexual act. The court held that there was a substantial chance of harm, that Boughey had the knowledge and capacity to know better, and that the act constituted reckless indifference to human life. He was convicted of murder.
Despite media attention and popular television shows that focus on murder cases, murder is relatively uncommon. Between September 2008 and September 2009, NSW recorded murder victims, compared to domestic violence-related assaults. Most murder victims are killed by family members or friends.
Manslaughter is the second type of homicide but involves a reduced level of intent compared to murder. It is punishable by up to years' imprisonment. A person may be charged with manslaughter where the intent to kill cannot be proven to the degree required for murder.
There are three types of manslaughter:
-
Voluntary manslaughter occurs when a person kills with intent, but mitigating circumstances (such as provocation) reduce their culpability. For the crime to be voluntary manslaughter rather than murder, these mitigating circumstances must be present.
-
Involuntary manslaughter is the killing of a person where death occurred because the accused acted recklessly or negligently, but without intention to kill.
-
Constructive manslaughter is the killing of a person while the accused was carrying out another dangerous or unlawful act. The manslaughter is "constructed" from the other unlawful act. For example, if a person assaults another without intending to kill or inflict serious harm, but death results, this may be construed as manslaughter.
Case Study: DPP v Newbury and Jones [1977] AC 500
The accused deliberately dropped a concrete slab from a bridge, which struck and killed a train guard. This was held to constitute involuntary manslaughter even though there was no intention to kill or harm anyone.
Infanticide is a special category of manslaughter applying to the death of a baby under months old at the hands of its mother. The Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) requires courts to consider the mother's state of mind at the time. Post-natal depression can be a mitigating circumstance if the mother was suffering from it when she killed her baby.
Dangerous driving causing death is a particular type of manslaughter enacted to deal with deaths resulting from motor vehicle accidents. It applies when a person drives unsafely and recklessly (such as under the influence of alcohol or drugs, or at excessive speed) and causes another person's death. A conviction carries a maximum penalty of years' imprisonment, or years if aggravated by certain circumstances.
Case Study: R v Munter [2009] NSWSC 158
Todd Munter was charged with manslaughter after punching 66-year-old Ken Proctor during a dispute about water restrictions. Proctor fell after the punch, and Munter kicked him with moderate force. Shortly afterward, Proctor died from a heart attack resulting from the blows.
Although there was no apparent intention to murder, the court deemed that Proctor's death was caused by Munter's unlawful assault. Munter was convicted and sentenced to three years and three months' imprisonment. This case demonstrates the application of causation in homicide.
Assault
Assault is the most common crime against the person. It includes both causing physical harm and threatening to cause physical harm (known as common assault).
Physical assault is a direct act where force is applied to another person's body unlawfully and without consent. It is punishable by up to five years' imprisonment. Threatening to cause physical harm can also constitute assault if it causes the victim to fear immediate and unlawful violence. Threatening phone calls, text messages, or emails may fall into this category.
Aggravated assault is more serious and occurs when the assailant uses an object (rather than just their body) or attacks a police officer carrying out their duties. Recent cases have involved thieves threatening people during robberies with hypodermic syringes allegedly containing infected blood—such acts may constitute aggravated assault.
Sexual offences
Sexual assault occurs when someone is forced into sexual intercourse against their will and without consent. Formerly known as "rape," the definition includes situations where consent is withdrawn during intercourse. The Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) defines sexual intercourse broadly to include various sexual acts, including oral sex and penetration. Sexual assault can occur to both men and women, although the vast majority of victims are women. Male victims are thought to be under-reported due to fear of reporting.
Understanding Consent
Lack of consent is central to sexual assault. The Act specifies that a person is not consenting if they are:
- Substantially intoxicated by drugs or alcohol and therefore lack the capacity to consent
- Intimidated or coerced into the act
- Subject to the accused abusing a position of trust or authority over them
Aggravated sexual assault applies where aggravating circumstances exist, such as:
- Violence is used
- The victim is under years old
- The victim has a serious physical or intellectual disability
Indecent assault is another sexual offence where the accused commits an assault with a sexual element on or in the presence of another person without consent. While indecent acts are not expressly defined in the Crimes Act, they include sexually touching the genitals or other body parts without consent.
Aggravated sexual assault in company is the most serious sexual offence in NSW, punishable by life imprisonment—equivalent to murder. The offence involves sexual assault performed with another person or people present, together with either depriving the victim of liberty or inflicting or threatening bodily harm.
Legislative Reform Following Public Outcry
This offence was introduced in 2001 following a series of "gang rapes" in Sydney's inner-west that led to public outcry for law reform.
Case Study: R v AEM (Snr); R v KEM; R v MM [2002] NSWCCA 58
Three young men lured two 16-year-old girls to a home in Villawood and sexually assaulted them over several hours, threatening them with knives and death threats. At the time, the only applicable crime was aggravated sexual assault with a maximum penalty of years' imprisonment. The men were originally sentenced to five to six years each.
Public outrage over the perceived leniency led Parliament to create the new offence with a life imprisonment penalty. On appeal in 2002, the offenders' sentences were increased to to years each.
Offences against the sovereign
These are among the oldest crimes and include political offences against the state or heads of state, such as treason and sedition. The laws aim to protect the structure, authority, and integrity of the state and its citizens.
Historically, such laws were used more frequently to prevent or punish attempts to overthrow or criticize heads of state. In Australia's stable parliamentary democracy, these laws have largely fallen out of use, with objections typically aired through protest, public comment, elections, or law reform.
Treason was a common law crime in England before being codified by King Edward III in the Statute of Treasons in 1351. Originally defined as acts against the sovereign (the monarch), it was later widened to include heads of state such as the prime minister and governor-general. Treason was imported into Australian law from the UK and enacted in NSW under Part 2 of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), and federally under the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) and later s 80.1 of the Criminal Code 1995 (Cth). Under NSW law, the 1351 Act remains in force.
Treason involves any attempt or manifest intention to levy war against the state, assist the enemy, or cause harm to or death of the Governor-General, Prime Minister, or Queen of Australia. Formerly punishable by death, treason now carries up to years' imprisonment in NSW or life imprisonment federally.
Sedition involves promoting discontent or overthrow of the government or sovereign. Dating to at least 1606, seditious acts historically included oral or written intentions to bring the sovereign into hatred or contempt, or inciting disaffection against the government or parliament. These laws were criticized as enabling abuse to silence opposition and public comment, endangering freedom of speech.
Sedition laws had fallen into disuse in Australia until 2005, when Prime Minister John Howard's government introduced controversial anti-terrorism laws in the Anti-Terrorism Act (No. 2) 2005 (Cth), reviving sedition law. Under s 80.2 of the Criminal Code 1995 (Cth), it is a crime to urge another person to use force or violence for purposes such as overthrowing the government or Constitution, or interfering with parliamentary elections. The offences carry up to seven years' imprisonment.
These sedition laws received widespread public criticism as unnecessary, outdated, and dangerous to freedom of expression, particularly regarding media and arts commentary. When the Labor government was elected in November 2007, it commissioned the Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) to review the laws with a view to amending them. The ALRC recommended removing the term "sedition" and amending various elements and available defences. At the time of publication, the laws remained in force unamended.
Economic offences
Economic offences encompass a wide range of crimes resulting in loss of property or money. This is the largest area of criminal law because it includes some of the most common crimes. Economic offences fall into three main categories: crimes against property, white-collar crime, and computer offences.
Crimes against property
In NSW, there are three main property offences: larceny, robbery, and break and enter.
Larceny (commonly known as "theft" or "stealing") is the most common property offence and one of the most likely economic crimes people will experience. Larceny occurs when one or more persons intentionally take another person's property without consent and without intention to return it. Shoplifting is one of the most common forms of larceny. The offence is punishable by up to five years' imprisonment, though this varies depending on the type of larceny.
Robbery is more serious than larceny. It occurs when force is used in the act of stealing goods or when property is taken directly from a victim. If accompanied by the use or threatened use of a weapon, it is called "armed robbery" and carries a higher sentence.
Break and enter (commonly known as "burglary") refers to a series of offences in the Crimes Act that generally occur when a person enters a room or building (such as a private residence) with the intention of committing an offence. Usually, the offender intends to commit another property offence like larceny.
White-collar crime
White-collar crime is a general term for various non-violent crimes associated with business people or professionals. Such crimes are often difficult to detect and can be time-consuming and expensive to investigate. Three common white-collar crimes are embezzlement, tax evasion, and insider trading.
Embezzlement occurs when a person (usually an employee) misappropriates another person's property or money entrusted to them. This typically involves employees stealing from employers, such as by transferring money to their own accounts, stealing from cash registers, or taking petty cash. Embezzlement may involve large-scale corporate theft with multiple offenders or small amounts stolen from local businesses. Money is often embezzled in small amounts over time, with accounts or records modified to hide the conduct. Embezzled money can be difficult to recover through courts, as it may be untraceable or the offender may be unable to repay it.
Tax evasion is a common white-collar crime occurring when a person or company tries to avoid paying taxes. It often involves fraudulently completing tax returns to understate income, or organizing businesses or property to hide income or assets, thereby reducing tax owed. Tax evasion can incur high penalties when discovered.
Insider trading is an offence related to buying and selling company shares. It occurs when a person (usually a stockbroker or company director) obtains confidential inside information about a company that will affect the share price. The information typically relates to significant increases or drops in share price, which the offender exploits by buying or selling their own shares to gain benefits or avoid losses.
Case Study: R v Rivkin (2003) 198 ALR 400
Rene Rivkin, a well-known entrepreneur, investor, and stockbroker, was found guilty of insider trading. He purchased $50,000 Qantas shares in April 2001 after being told confidential information by a company executive just hours before about an impending Qantas-Impulse merger. The share price was likely to rise once the information became public.
The purchase resulted in a small profit of $2662.94. Rivkin was convicted and sentenced to nine months of periodic weekend detention, and his stockbroker licence was banned. This highly publicized case demonstrated that even small profits from insider trading constitute a serious offence.
Computer offences
Computer offences include various crimes related to hacking and unauthorized access or modification of data. The Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) lists numerous computer offences such as unauthorized access to, modification of, or impairment of restricted data. More serious crimes include impairment of electronic communication or unauthorized access/modification of restricted data with intent to commit a serious offence. Serious computer crimes can incur penalties up to years' imprisonment.
Computer crimes might occur when an offender breaks through a company's security firewalls and alters or steals company data. This could result in private financial data (such as bank accounts or credit cards) becoming available to those who could use it unlawfully. Computer crimes may be committed by employees or outsiders with sufficient computer literacy.
Fraud is another economic offence that can include white-collar crime, property offences, or computer crime. Fraud refers to deceitful or dishonest conduct carried out for personal gain. It is often an element of other offences, such as fraudulent misappropriation, fraudulent personation, or obtaining credit by fraud.
Fraudulent crimes are increasingly relevant with technological advances, especially internet use and electronic facilities like ATMs. Common frauds include identity theft, internet phishing (fraudulently posing as a legitimate website), or requesting funds or account details by email under false pretences. Nigerian email scams and ATM skimming devices are well-known examples.
Identity fraud involves using another person's details to apply for credit cards, loans, or open bank accounts to deposit fraudulently gained funds. The Australian Federal Police estimates identity fraud costs Australians over $4 billion annually.
Drug offences
Drug offences relate to acts involving prohibited or restricted drugs. While many crimes may be associated with drug abuse or addiction (such as larceny, robbery, break and enter, or prostitution), drug offences specifically focus on the movement of drugs themselves, including growing, selling, and using drugs.
Society has access to many types of drugs, both legal and illegal. Legal or unrestricted drugs include paracetamol or caffeine. Illegal drugs have been prohibited by law because lawmakers deem them unsafe for general use, including cannabis or heroin. Restricted drugs or controlled substances may be available by prescription only (e.g., cold and flu tablets, anti-depressants) or restricted for particular scientific or medical uses.
In NSW, the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) outlines numerous offences related to prohibited or restricted drugs, with additional offences in the Summary Offences Act 1988 (NSW). The main federal legislation is the Customs Act 1901 (Cth), which often applies where there is an international element, such as cross-border drug trafficking.
The most common drug offences relate to prohibited drugs and focus on:
-
Possession of a prohibited drug: The drug must be in the accused's custody or control, and the accused must know about it. This includes shared ownership or simply minding it for another person.
-
Use of a prohibited drug: The intentional consumption of the drug by any means, although this does not apply if use occurs in a medically-supervised injecting centre.
-
Cultivation: Applies to the growth or cultivation of prohibited plants, such as cannabis.
-
Supply of a prohibited drug: This is a broad offence including offering or agreeing to supply, whether or not drugs or money actually changed hands. It can include possessing drugs for supply purposes or single or multiple supply instances.
Drug offences often carry severe penalties. Users may face penalties such as attending drug rehabilitation programs and complying with good behaviour bonds, with cases sometimes heard in dedicated youth or adult drug courts. Suppliers and manufacturers are dealt with much more severely, as their actions have greater community impact. Drug traffickers face lengthy jail sentences in Australia, particularly for international trafficking.
In some countries (including Indonesia, Singapore, and Malaysia), traffickers face the death penalty. For example, 25-year-old Australian Van Nguyen was controversially hanged for drug trafficking in Singapore in December 2005 after being caught importing 396.2g of heroin at Changi airport in 2002, despite calls for clemency from tens of thousands of Australians, the Prime Ministers of Australia and New Zealand, and the Pope.
Driving offences
Driving or traffic offences are among the most commonly committed offences in NSW. They are included under the Road Transport (Safety and Traffic Management) Act 1999 (NSW) and the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW).
Police enforce and process many driving offences through on-the-spot fines. Such fines generally relate to strict liability traffic offences like speeding. These are easier to process as they only require police to show the act was committed, without considering the individual's intention or state of mind. Traffic offences are regulated by the NSW Roads and Traffic Authority (RTA), which controls the demerit system where offenders lose points from their driver's licence for certain traffic offences.
Common traffic offences include:
- Exceeding the speed limit
- Driving without a licence or while disqualified
- Ignoring road signs
- Driving above the legal blood alcohol limit of 0.05
Driving offences also include serious offences punishable by significantly higher penalties. Such offences are dealt with through courts and may result in large fines, suspended or cancelled licences, or imprisonment. Serious offences include furious or reckless driving, negligent driving causing death or serious bodily harm, failing to stop and assist in an accident involving death or injury, and driving under the influence of proscribed drugs or with excessive blood-alcohol levels.
Public order offences
Public order offences relate to acts deemed to disturb public order, such as disturbances in or in sight of a public area. Numerous public order offences are listed in the Summary Offences Act 1988 (NSW) and Part 6A of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW). Public order offences are often acts society deems inappropriate or offensive in public, though they may be legal or acceptable within one's own home.
Common public order offences include:
- Obscene, indecent, or threatening language or behaviour in public
- Possessing a knife in a public place without reasonable excuse
- Obstructing traffic or ignoring reasonable police directions to "move on"
- Damaging public fountains or protected places
These offences usually incur fines or lesser penalties. However, some public order offences are more serious crimes heard in court with significantly higher penalties.
Affray involves using or threatening to use unlawful violence that would cause a person of reasonable firmness to fear for their safety. It is often charged following public fights or brawls where nearby people could have feared for their safety and is punishable by up to years' imprisonment.
Riot is similar to affray but involves or more people using or threatening unlawful violence for a common purpose. Other serious public order offences include explosives and firearms offences, bomb hoaxes, and participation in criminal organizations.
Preliminary crimes
Preliminary offences refer to offences that precede the commission of a crime or where the crime has not been completed for some reason (e.g., it was interrupted or unsuccessful). Preliminary crimes fall into two main categories: attempts and conspiracy.
An attempt to commit a crime is still considered an offence and is usually punishable by the same penalty as if the crime had occurred. Section 344 of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) states that "any person who attempts to commit an offence for which a penalty is provided... shall be liable to that penalty." However, certain attempts, such as attempted murder, are dealt with specifically and may carry lower penalties.
Because the penalty for an attempt is so high, the prosecution must show the offence was all but completed or failed despite the intention to complete it. The accused may have a lawful reason for the conduct or no real intention of completing the apparent crime.
Case Study: R v Whybrow (1951) 35 CAR 141
A husband connected electricity to the family bath's soap dish to electrocute his wife. The plan failed and his wife received only a shock.
The court found him guilty of attempted murder because his intention for the act to succeed and result in death was clear, despite its failure. This case demonstrates that even when a crime fails, the clear intention to commit it can result in conviction.
Conspiracy occurs when two or more people jointly conspire to commit a crime. The conspiracy is complete when an agreement (the act) is reached between parties, with intention shown by each person's explicit agreement to commit the offence. It may be difficult for prosecutors to prove conspiracy without a confession or record (such as a signed document or phone tap), because the allegedly agreed-upon crime will not have taken place.
Regulatory offences
Regulatory offences are usually set out in delegated legislation, such as regulations or local laws, addressing day-to-day situations and standards. They differ from more serious offences in statute or common law that can only be modified by parliament or (in some cases) courts. Regulatory offences are considered minor with lesser penalties. They are usually set by the government department or agency responsible for that area of law and policy and require faster or more frequent change than traditional legislative processes allow.
Examples of regulatory offences include:
- Watering the garden despite water restrictions
- Breach of occupational health and safety regulations
- Travelling on public transport without a valid ticket
- Lighting a fire or barbecue on a total fire ban day
Regulatory offences are usually strict liability offences not requiring proof of intention. They are enforced by government officers or local law enforcement. A breach usually incurs a fine or loss of a particular licence; in extreme cases, more serious criminal charges may be laid.
Classification by seriousness
All criminal offences are separated into two important categories depending on severity: summary offences and indictable offences. Whether an offence is summary or indictable is crucial to how the case is prosecuted and heard.
Summary offences
Summary offences are less serious offences that usually incur lesser penalties than indictable offences, though they may still have serious consequences. Summary offences are heard and sentenced in a Local Court before a magistrate, not tried before a jury. Penalties range from a bond or fine to a jail sentence of up to two years, or five years if convicted of multiple offences. Many summary offences are found in the Summary Offences Act 1988 (NSW) and include regulatory offences.
Indictable offences
Indictable offences are more serious offences such as assault or property damage, generally heard in the District Court. An initial committal hearing is held in the Local Court where a magistrate determines whether the prosecution's evidence is sufficient to go to trial. Indictable offences are then heard and sentenced by a judge or, where a not guilty plea is entered, tried before a judge and jury.
Many indictable offences are also "triable summarily," meaning the accused can elect to have the case heard by a magistrate in the Local Court or by a judge and jury in the District Court. Local Court hearings offer significant administrative advantages, including earlier hearing dates, faster hearings, less formality and cost, and possibly lesser sentences due to Local Court restrictions on maximum sentences. However, where a not guilty plea is entered, the District Court offers the advantage of a jury trial, which might be more inclined to acquit, though this is not guaranteed.
Comparison of summary and indictable offences
| Summary Offence | Indictable Offence |
|---|---|
| Less serious offence tried by a magistrate in the Local Court | More serious offence (such as murder or rape) tried by a judge and jury |
| Judgment and punishment determined by a magistrate | Judgment determined by a jury; punishment determined by the judge |
| Charge usually laid by a police officer or government officer | Charge brought by a public prosecutor working for the state |
| Punishment usually less severe, such as a fine, good behaviour bond, or community service | Punishment usually results in imprisonment or hefty fine |
Parties to a crime
Crime is not always committed by one person alone. Others may be involved before or after the crime is carried out. Any person involved in any way may become a "party" to the crime. The level of punishment courts impose on a party is usually determined by that person's level of involvement. Parties to a crime are divided into four main categories:
Principal in the first degree: This is the principal offender—the person who actually commits the criminal act. In an armed robbery, this would be the person who pointed the gun and took the money. The principal offender is directly responsible for the crime being carried out and is likely to receive the highest sentence.
Principal in the second degree: This is a person who was present at the crime and assisted or encouraged the principal offender. In the armed robbery scenario, this may be the person who kept lookout by the door. Presence need not be immediate physical presence; assisting the principal may be sufficient, such as by providing instructions over the phone. The principal in the second degree may receive a lesser sentence depending on circumstances.
Accessory before the fact: An "accessory" is someone who has helped the principal plan or carry out the crime. An accessory before the fact has helped in planning or preparation before the actual act is carried out.
Accessory after the fact: This is someone who has assisted the principal after the actual act is committed, such as by driving a getaway car or disposing of evidence.
Key Points to Remember
Categories of Crime:
- Crimes are categorized by type of offence (e.g., offences against the person, economic offences, drug offences), jurisdiction (NSW or Commonwealth), seriousness (summary or indictable), and parties involved (principal, accessory)
Strict Liability Offences:
- Only require proof of the actus reus (guilty act), not mens rea (guilty mind)
- Apply primarily to minor offences like traffic violations and regulatory breaches
Offences Against the Person:
- Include homicide (murder, manslaughter, infanticide, dangerous driving causing death)
- Include assault (common, physical, aggravated)
- Include sexual offences (sexual assault, indecent assault, aggravated sexual assault in company)
Economic Offences:
- Encompass property crimes (larceny, robbery, break and enter)
- Include white-collar crime (embezzlement, tax evasion, insider trading)
- Cover computer offences (hacking, fraud)
Classification by Seriousness:
- Summary offences are less serious and heard by a magistrate in the Local Court
- Indictable offences are more serious and heard by a judge (and jury for not guilty pleas) in the District Court
Parties to a Crime:
- Principal in the first degree – commits the act
- Principal in the second degree – present and assists
- Accessory before the fact – helps plan
- Accessory after the fact – helps after the crime
Important Cases:
- R v Munter [2009] NSWSC 158 – Demonstrates causation in manslaughter
- Boughey v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 10 – Reckless indifference to human life constituting murder
- R v AEM (Snr); R v KEM; R v MM [2002] NSWCCA 58 – Led to creation of aggravated sexual assault in company offence
- R v Rivkin (2003) 198 ALR 400 – High-profile insider trading case
Key Terms: Homicide, murder, manslaughter (voluntary, involuntary, constructive), infanticide, assault, aggravated assault, sexual assault, consent, treason, sedition, larceny, robbery, embezzlement, fraud, strict liability offences, summary offences, indictable offences, principal offender, accessory