Behavioural Treatments of Phobias (AQA A-Level Psychology): Revision Notes
Behavioural Treatments of Phobias
Introduction to behavioural treatments
Behavioural approaches to treating phobias are based on the principle that phobias represent maladaptive learned behaviours. Since these fears are acquired through learning processes, they can be replaced with more adaptive responses using conditioning techniques. The goal is to substitute fear responses with feelings of calm and relaxation when encountering the phobic stimulus.
Behavioural treatment of phobias refers to therapeutic approaches that use conditioning techniques to eliminate phobic responses by replacing fear with relaxation. These treatments are grounded in classical conditioning principles and focus on changing the behavioural response rather than exploring underlying psychological causes.
Systematic desensitisation
Systematic desensitisation (SD) is a gradual behavioural therapy that treats anxiety disorders by teaching patients relaxation techniques before exposing them to a progressive hierarchy of feared objects or situations. This approach was developed by Wolpe in 1958 and remains one of the most widely used behavioural treatments for phobias.
Principles of systematic desensitisation
The treatment is based on the principle of reciprocal inhibition, which suggests that anxiety and relaxation are opposing emotional states that cannot coexist simultaneously. When a person learns to relax in the presence of anxiety-provoking stimuli, the fear response is gradually reduced and eventually eliminated.
SD follows a structured, step-by-step approach that typically takes about a month to complete. The process involves three main stages:
- Hierarchy construction - Before treatment begins, a desensitisation hierarchy is created, ranking feared objects or situations from least to most anxiety-provoking
- Relaxation training - Patients learn specific relaxation strategies for each stage of contact with phobic stimuli
- Gradual exposure - Progressive work through the hierarchy, combining relaxation with increasing exposure
Types of desensitisation
Covert desensitisation involves patients imagining scenarios with the feared stimulus, which is often the initial approach.
In vivo desensitisation requires actual contact with real phobic objects or situations. For example, someone with snake phobia might begin SD treatment by looking at pictures of snakes and progressively work through to actually holding one.
Flooding
Flooding (also called implosion) represents a more direct behavioural therapy approach where patients immediately confront their most feared scenarios rather than following a gradual progression. This technique involves direct confrontation with the feared object or situation without the opportunity for typical avoidance responses.
How flooding works
The principle behind flooding is that patients cannot maintain high levels of anxiety indefinitely, so the fear response will eventually subside naturally. By preventing avoidance behaviours and forcing direct contact with the phobic stimulus, anxiety peaks at such extreme levels that it cannot be sustained and gradually decreases.
Unlike systematic desensitisation, flooding does not involve relaxation training or hierarchical progression. Instead, patients are immediately exposed to their most feared scenarios, often for extended periods until their anxiety naturally reduces.
Research evidence
Contemporary research: technophobia treatment
Brosnan & Thorpe (2006) conducted important research examining whether systematic desensitisation could effectively treat technophobia - the fear of interacting with modern technology. Their study is particularly relevant given the increasing importance of technology in modern life.
Research Example: Treatment of technophobia by systematic desensitisation – Mark Brosnan & Sue Thorpe (2006)
Participants: Two studies were conducted. The first involved 16 participants (8 computer-anxious individuals and 8 non-anxious controls). The second study used 30 computer-anxious participants assigned to treatment or non-treatment groups, plus 59 non-anxious controls.
Procedure: A 10-week systematic desensitisation programme was delivered to computer-anxious participants, teaching relaxation techniques and gradual exposure to technology.
Findings: In the first study, computer anxiety and coping strategies significantly improved in the treatment group, reaching levels comparable to non-anxious controls. The second study showed that anxiety reduction in the treated group was three times greater than in the non-treated group. By the end of the academic year, the treated group no longer differed from controls, while the untreated group remained significantly more anxious.
Conclusions: The research demonstrated that systematic desensitisation is effective in reducing technophobia, supporting the use of behavioural therapy for modern phobias.
Classical research studies
- Jones (1924) provided early evidence for systematic desensitisation by treating 'Little Peter's' phobia of white fluffy animals and objects. The rabbit was gradually presented to Peter at closer distances as his anxiety levels decreased, with food rewards given for progress. Eventually, Peter developed positive associations with the rabbit, and this improvement generalised to similar animals and objects.
- Wolpe (1960) demonstrated flooding effectiveness by treating a girl's car phobia. The patient was placed in a car and driven around for four hours until her extreme fear reaction was completely eliminated, showing the rapid effectiveness of direct exposure methods.
- Rothbaum et al. (1998) explored virtual reality exposure therapy as an alternative to traditional systematic desensitisation and flooding. This approach allows treatment within controlled environments without leaving the therapist's office, providing more control over phobic stimuli while reducing patient exposure to harm and embarrassment.
Evaluation
Strengths of behavioural treatments
- Effectiveness for simple phobias: Behavioural treatments demonstrate high success rates for treating straightforward, specific phobias. Research consistently shows positive outcomes when these techniques are applied to clearly defined fears.
- Scientific basis: These approaches are grounded in well-established learning principles and supported by extensive empirical research. The systematic nature of the treatments allows for measurable progress and objective assessment of outcomes.
- Practical advantages: SD is particularly suitable for patients who can learn relaxation strategies and have sufficient imagination to visualise feared scenarios effectively. The gradual approach helps build confidence and ensures patient comfort throughout treatment.
- Rapid results: Flooding can deliver immediate improvements, especially when patients are encouraged to continue self-directed exposure outside therapy sessions. Some studies suggest flooding is equally effective as SD but achieves results more quickly.
Limitations of behavioural treatments
- Limited effectiveness for complex phobias: Behavioural treatments work best for simple, specific phobias but show reduced effectiveness with agoraphobia and social phobias. This suggests that more complex fears may not be adequately explained or treated through purely behavioural approaches.
- Individual differences: SD requires patients who can effectively use relaxation strategies and have vivid enough imaginations to engage with feared scenarios. Not all individuals possess these capabilities, limiting the treatment's applicability.
- Ethical concerns: Both SD and flooding raise ethical considerations as they can be psychologically distressing. Cost-benefit analyses must weigh the long-term benefits of eliminating phobias against the short-term psychological costs of treatment.
- Physical health considerations: Flooding is unsuitable for patients with poor physical health, as the extreme anxiety levels during direct confrontation with feared stimuli can cause significant physiological stress, potentially triggering heart attacks or other medical complications.
- Uncertainty about mechanisms: While these treatments show effectiveness, there's no guarantee that imaginary confrontation with phobias (covert desensitisation) will translate to real-world situations, suggesting that in vivo treatment may be superior for lasting results.
Key Points to Remember:
- Behavioural treatments use conditioning techniques to replace fear responses with relaxation when treating phobias
- Systematic desensitisation employs gradual exposure combined with relaxation training, based on reciprocal inhibition principles
- Flooding involves immediate, direct confrontation with the most feared stimulus until anxiety naturally subsides
- Research evidence strongly supports the effectiveness of both approaches, particularly for simple, specific phobias
- Evaluation shows these treatments work well for simple phobias but have limitations with complex phobias and require careful ethical consideration