Language games (OCR A-Level Religious Studies): Flashcards
Practise the cards
14 cards from this deck
ShowHide
Practise the cards
14 cards from this deck
Wittgenstein's language games
Wittgenstein's language games
Wittgenstein: Language functions like game w/ rules from context/form of life
Meaning is Use principle
Meaning is Use principle
Words gain meaning from use in context, not fixed meaning
Different Games, Different Rules
Different Games, Different Rules
Different discourses (science, ethics, religion) have unique rules
No Universal Language (Wittgenstein)
No Universal Language (Wittgenstein)
Each language game has own rules; no single universal logic
Religious language as language game
Religious language as language game
Religious terms meaningful in religious context, not empirical
Form of life (Wittgenstein)
Form of life (Wittgenstein)
Cultural/social context where language game is played
Religious language autonomy
Religious language autonomy
Religious language has own criteria, not judged by scientific standards
Wittgenstein vs verification principle
Wittgenstein vs verification principle
Religious language meaningful in own game even if not verifiable
Incommensurability of language games
Incommensurability of language games
Different games can't be fully translated; use different rules
Wittgenstein's quote on meaning
Wittgenstein's quote on meaning
Don't look for the meanings; look for the use
D.Z. Phillips on philosophy & religion
D.Z. Phillips on philosophy & religion
Two different groups w/ different definitions of God
Theological anti-realism weakness
Theological anti-realism weakness
Religious people claim statements have reality across all contexts
Circularity problem w/ language games
Circularity problem w/ language games
Where does language game get meaning? Needs external link
Interfaith dialogue challenge
Interfaith dialogue challenge
People understand language outside their beliefs; dividing harmful
