Labour Productivity, Turnover, Retention and Absenteeism (Edexcel A-Level Business): Revision Notes
Labour Productivity, Turnover, Retention and Absenteeism
Understanding workforce performance metrics is essential for businesses to assess efficiency, manage costs, and make strategic decisions about human resources. This note explores four key measures: labour productivity, labour turnover, labour retention, and absenteeism.
Labour productivity
Labour productivity measures output per worker over a specific time period. It is calculated using the formula:
This metric provides an important indicator of workforce efficiency. When comparing teams, departments, or businesses with similar equipment and staffing levels, labour productivity identifies which groups are performing most effectively.
Interpreting productivity figures with caution
While labour productivity is valuable, it must be interpreted carefully. Several factors can influence productivity beyond workforce efficiency:
Equipment differences: Businesses using modern, advanced equipment typically show higher productivity than those using older machinery. This reflects capital investment rather than worker performance.
Process variations: Within the same business, highly automated production areas will naturally demonstrate higher productivity than labour-intensive sections with minimal capital equipment.
Industry differences: Manufacturing industries generally show higher average productivity than service industries because manufacturing uses more capital per employee.
Productivity and competitiveness
Increasing labour productivity generally strengthens a business's competitive position. Higher productivity reduces unit costs, allowing businesses to either:
- Lower prices to increase market share
- Maintain prices while improving profit margins
However, productivity improvements don't always guarantee increased competitiveness. This can happen when:
Competitors improve faster: Rival businesses may increase their productivity at an even greater rate, maintaining their competitive advantage.
Wage competition emerges: New competitors paying significantly lower wages can undercut prices despite lower productivity. UK manufacturing has faced this challenge from low-wage competitors in the Far East and Eastern Europe.
Non-price factors change: A competitor introducing a superior new product may attract customers regardless of price differences. Product quality and innovation can outweigh cost advantages.
Worked example: calculating labour productivity
Worked Example: Call Centre Productivity
Massamore Ltd operates a call centre in Glasgow providing customer service for a large energy company. During one week in October 2014, the centre's 140 staff handled 157,500 calls.
This means each employee handled an average of 1,125 calls during that week.
Practice question: productivity trends
Jengril Ltd manufactures household appliances at an Asian factory with a production line making kettles. The table below shows output and staffing levels between 2010 and 2014.
| Year | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total output (number of kettles) | 23,200 | 24,800 | 24,700 | 25,300 | 24,900 |
| Average number of employees | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 14 |
Task: Calculate labour productivity for each year and explain one possible reason for the pattern observed between 2010 and 2014.
Labour turnover
Labour turnover (or staff turnover) measures the proportion of employees leaving a business over a specific time period. The formula is:
Labour turnover rates vary significantly across departments, businesses, and industries. Understanding the causes and implications helps businesses manage their workforce effectively.
Causes of relatively high labour turnover
Low pay: When employees can find better-paid positions elsewhere, they are more likely to leave. Wage levels directly impact staff retention.
Limited development opportunities: Businesses offering few training programmes or promotion prospects encourage employees to seek career progression elsewhere.
Poor working conditions: Low job satisfaction, inadequate facilities, workplace bullying, and harassment all contribute to higher turnover rates.
Recruitment failures: Businesses that consistently hire candidates poorly suited to their roles experience higher turnover as mismatched employees leave quickly.
Economic conditions: During recessions, turnover typically falls as job vacancies decrease and workers fear unemployment. In economic booms with labour shortages, turnover rises as opportunities increase.
Problems associated with high labour turnover
High labour turnover creates several significant challenges for businesses:
Recruitment costs: Finding and hiring replacement staff involves significant expenses including advertising, interviewing, and selection processes.
Productivity loss: New employees require time to become familiar with their roles and business operations. High turnover reduces the human process advantage - the competitive benefit from experienced, knowledgeable staff.
Training investment: Large companies often provide induction programmes for new starters, adding to costs. Internal promotions to fill vacancies may require additional training for promoted employees.
Benefits of some labour turnover
While high turnover is generally problematic, moderate turnover can provide benefits:
Fresh perspectives: New staff bring innovative ideas and experience from other businesses, potentially improving practices and processes.
Performance management: Some employee departures involve ineffective workers leaving or being encouraged to leave, improving overall workforce quality.
Managed downsizing: When businesses need to reduce workforce size, natural turnover through resignations can achieve this without redundancy costs.
Cost control: In businesses paying low wages or offering poor conditions, accepting higher turnover may be more profitable than improving pay and conditions to retain staff.
Worked example: calculating labour turnover
Worked Example: Annual Staff Turnover
During 2014, 60 staff left Massamore Ltd.
This shows that 42.9% of Massamore staff left during the year - a relatively high turnover rate.
Labour retention
Labour retention measures the opposite of labour turnover - the rate at which employees remain with a business. It is calculated using:
Since retention is the inverse of turnover, a high retention rate indicates low turnover. The benefits of high retention mirror those of low turnover: reduced recruitment costs, greater continuity, workforce stability, and preserved human process advantages.
Worked example: calculating retention rate
Worked Example: Staff Retention Calculation
During 2014, 60 staff left Massamore Ltd, meaning 80 staff (140 - 60) remained.
This indicates that 57.1% of Massamore staff stayed with the business during the year.
Absenteeism
Absenteeism refers to employees being absent from work, creating various problems for businesses. Understanding and managing absenteeism is crucial for maintaining operational efficiency and controlling costs.
Problems caused by absenteeism
Absenteeism generates multiple interconnected problems that affect business performance:
Sick pay costs: When staff report illness, businesses typically must pay sick pay while receiving no productive work in return.
Cover arrangements: Hiring temporary staff or paying permanent employees overtime at premium rates increases labour costs.
Productivity impact: Remaining workers covering for absent colleagues or less productive temporary staff reduce overall output levels.
Project disruption: Prolonged absences, especially of key personnel, can cause major delays to important projects or critical work areas.
Customer satisfaction: Production delays or quality problems resulting from absences can lead to lost customers and damaged reputation.
Workforce morale: Staff left managing extra workload and problems become demotivated, potentially leading to further absences.
Cultural impact: High absenteeism rates create cultures where taking sick days becomes normalized and acceptable, perpetuating the problem.
Calculating absenteeism rates
Absenteeism can be measured daily or annually, expressed as percentages.
Daily absenteeism rate:
Annual absenteeism rate:
Worked example: daily absenteeism
Worked Example: Daily Absenteeism Rate
On 24 October 2014, eight staff were absent from Massamore Ltd.
This shows that 5.7% of Massamore staff were absent on that particular day.
Worked example: annual absenteeism
Worked Example: Annual Absenteeism Rate
During 2014, Massamore Ltd lost 1,000 staff days through absence. Each of the 140 staff should have worked 240 days, totalling 33,600 possible staff days (140 × 240).
The annual absenteeism rate of 3% is lower than the 5.7% recorded on 24 October, showing that single-day rates can vary significantly from annual averages.
Factors affecting absenteeism rates
Understanding what drives absenteeism helps businesses develop effective strategies to reduce it:
Business size: Small businesses typically experience lower absenteeism than large organizations. Smaller businesses foster stronger commitment and teamwork, whereas employees in large businesses may feel their absence won't be noticed.
Health and safety standards: Businesses with robust health and safety procedures suffer less illness-related absence than those with poor practices. Some jobs inherently carry higher health risks, naturally leading to higher absence rates.
Job design: Fragmented, repetitive tasks create low job satisfaction and demotivation, encouraging employees to report sick. Interesting, rewarding work correlates with lower absenteeism.
Workplace culture: Environments characterized by overwork, intimidation, bullying, and disregard for employee needs generate higher work-related stress. Stress-related absences are particularly problematic as they often extend for months.
Supervision style: Oversupervision and lack of trust lead to stress-related illness and higher absence rates. Employees who feel micromanaged become demotivated.
Compensation levels: Workers who feel significantly underpaid view sick days as compensation for inadequate wages. Low pay acts as a demotivator, contributing to absenteeism.
Practice question: analysing workforce data
Hunter & Co operates an online gift business with a warehouse in Staffordshire for packing and dispatching orders. In 2012, a new warehouse manager introduced new working practices following a three-month consultation process allowing all staff to express views on proposed arrangements.
| Metric | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average number of staff employed | 1,590 | 1,610 | 1,620 | 1,670 | 1,710 |
| Average number of staff leaving | 410 | 440 | 500 | 410 | 310 |
| Total number of staff absences (in days) | 5,760 | 5,890 | 6,180 | 5,200 | 4,200 |
Context: According to a 2011 survey, average UK staff turnover was 15.6%. The Office for National Statistics reported UK staff absence at 1.8% in 2011.
Tasks:
- (a) Calculate annual staff turnover at Hunter & Co's warehouse between 2010 and 2014.
- (b) Calculate annual absenteeism rates between 2010 and 2014 (assume employees can work 240 days per year).
- (c) Assess whether changing working practices in 2012 was beneficial for Hunter & Co.
Strategies to increase productivity and retention, and reduce turnover and absenteeism
Improving workforce performance metrics delivers significant business benefits. Higher productivity increases output per employee, raising revenue and profit. Lower staff turnover reduces recruitment, selection, and training costs, improving profitability. Several human resources strategies can achieve these aims.
Financial rewards
Some motivation theories suggest that increased financial rewards encourage employees to work harder and produce more. F. W. Taylor, an American engineer and business consultant, developed the theory of scientific management. Taylor proposed that once the optimal method for completing a task was identified, workers should be paid according to their output.
Taylor argued for "a fair day's pay for a fair day's work," believing money was the primary motivator. He advocated piece rates - payment systems linking earnings directly to units produced.
Benefits of piece rate systems:
Performance-based rewards: Productive, conscientious workers earn more than lazy or slow workers, creating clear incentive structures.
Motivation enhancement: Direct links between effort and earnings motivate workers to maximize productivity.
Business efficiency: Businesses extract higher output from employees, improving overall efficiency and competitiveness.
However, piece rates work best in manufacturing environments where output is easily measurable. Service industries and roles requiring collaboration may require different financial reward strategies, such as performance bonuses, profit sharing, or commission structures.
Other strategies mentioned in the specification but not detailed in these pages include:
- Employee share ownership schemes
- Consultation strategies (as demonstrated in the Hunter & Co example)
- Empowerment strategies giving employees more autonomy and responsibility
Remember!
Key Formulas:
Critical Concepts:
- Labour productivity measures output per worker and indicates workforce efficiency
- High labour turnover creates recruitment costs and productivity losses but can bring fresh ideas
- Labour retention is the inverse of turnover - high retention means low turnover
- Absenteeism causes multiple problems including costs, disruption, and cultural issues
- Financial rewards like piece rates can increase productivity when linked directly to output
- Always interpret workforce metrics carefully considering context like equipment, industry, and economic conditions
- Improving productivity doesn't guarantee competitiveness if competitors improve faster or non-price factors change