The cosmological argument (Edexcel A-Level Religious Studies): Flashcards
📚Flashcards
Practise the cards
15 cards from this deck
ShowHide
Practise the cards
15 cards from this deck
Type of reasoning in cosmological argument
Type of reasoning in cosmological argument
Inductive argument
Knowledge type: cosmological argument
Knowledge type: cosmological argument
A Posteriori (based on experience)
Natural theology: cosmological arg
Natural theology: cosmological arg
Uses rational, scientific evidence to prove God
Aquinas' First Way
Aquinas' First Way
Argument from motion - unmoved mover
Movement concept in First Way
Movement concept in First Way
From potentiality to actuality
Aquinas' view on infinite regress
Aquinas' view on infinite regress
Impossible - must be a start
Aquinas' Second Way
Aquinas' Second Way
Argument from causation - uncaused causer
Aquinas' Third Way
Aquinas' Third Way
Argument from contingency - necessary being
Contingent existence meaning
Contingent existence meaning
Relies on something else for existence (e.g. food, parents)
Necessary being
Necessary being
Being that must exist; started chain of contingent beings
Cosmological arg: key achievement
Cosmological arg: key achievement
Establishes God's necessity
Fallacy of composition (Hume & Russell)
Fallacy of composition (Hume & Russell)
Part truth ≠ whole truth
Hume's view on necessary being
Hume's view on necessary being
Rejects the possibility
Physics challenge to cosmological arg
Physics challenge to cosmological arg
Something can come from nothing
Copleston on fallacy of composition
Copleston on fallacy of composition
Contingency args don't leap from parts to whole
