New Economic Policy (Edexcel A-Level History): Revision Notes
New Economic Policy
Introduction: why was the NEP introduced?
In 1921, Lenin introduced the New Economic Policy (NEP) as a dramatic shift away from War Communism. This policy change came in response to a critical combination of economic collapse and political unrest that threatened the survival of the Communist government.
By early 1921, Russia faced severe crisis:
- Major peasant rebellions (such as in Tambov) erupted against Communist policies
- The Kronstadt sailors' mutiny in March 1921 showed that even former Communist supporters had turned against the government
- War Communism had caused economic devastation and famine
- Food production had collapsed to dangerous levels
Lenin described the NEP as an "economic retreat" designed to prevent "political defeat". He was willing to make economic compromises with capitalism in order to keep the Communist Party in power.
Key reasons for introducing the NEP
To retain political power
- Lenin recognised that continuing with War Communism would lead to further rebellions
- The policy was designed to prevent the collapse of Communist rule
- Economic compromises were necessary to maintain political control
To revive the economy
- Russia desperately needed to stimulate grain production
- The famine had to be ended urgently
- Industrial production had collapsed and needed recovery
To build socialism
- By 1921, it was clear that the expected European revolution would not happen
- Russia would need to build socialism alone, without help from other socialist countries
- The NEP would provide an economic foundation for constructing socialism in Russia
Lenin's thinking evolved during 1921. He came to argue that the NEP, not War Communism, was actually the correct foundation for building socialism. He claimed that the Communist Party must learn to use capitalist trading methods to achieve communist goals. Importantly, he emphasised that the NEP would create peace with the peasants, allowing peasants and workers to build socialism together.
Measures of the New Economic Policy
The NEP fundamentally changed Russia's economic system by creating a mixed economy – one that combined both capitalist and socialist elements.
Agricultural reforms
End of grain requisitioning
- The hated policy of forcibly seizing peasants' grain was abolished
- Replaced with a tax in kind – peasants paid a fixed amount of grain as tax
- Peasants could keep any surplus grain after paying the tax
Free market agriculture
- Peasants gained the freedom to buy, sell and produce as they wished
- Agricultural production was left to market forces
- This gave peasants a clear incentive to grow more food
Industrial reforms
Small-scale industry
- Factories and workshops employing fewer than 20 people were denationalised
- These small enterprises were allowed to trade freely in the market
- Many were returned to their former capitalist owners
Large-scale industry
- Major industries and large factories remained under state control (nationalised)
- The government kept control of the "commanding heights" of the economy
Financial reforms
Reintroduction of money
- Money, which had been abolished under War Communism, was brought back
- Lenin emphasised the need for a stable currency
- All factories and workshops were expected to make a profit
- Even government-run industries had to operate on commercial principles
- Services like transport, which had been free during the Civil War, now required payment
Understanding State Capitalism
This represented a major economic compromise. The NEP allowed capitalism to operate in certain sectors whilst maintaining socialist control over key industries. Lenin argued this was a form of state capitalism – using capitalist methods to build socialism, or as he put it, allowing communists to "build socialism with capitalist hands".
Consequences of the New Economic Policy
The NEP produced mixed results. While it successfully stabilised the economy and ended political unrest, it also created new problems and contradictions.
Political and economic stability
The NEP achieved its primary goal of restoring stability to Russia.
End of the famine
- Ending grain requisitioning proved extremely popular with the peasants
- Free trade gave peasants a strong incentive to grow more food
- Food of all kinds became widely available in both country and city markets
- The famine that had devastated Russia came to an end
Grain production recovery
The following data shows the dramatic recovery in grain production:
| Year | Grain harvest (million tons) |
|---|---|
| 1913 | 80.11 |
| 1920 | 46.10 |
| 1921 | 37.61 |
| 1922 | 50.30 |
| 1923 | 56.60 |
| 1924 | 51.40 |
| 1925 | 72.50 |
| 1926 | 76.80 |
By 1925-26, grain production had nearly recovered to pre-war (1913) levels.
Political stability
- The end of grain requisitioning removed the policy most hated by the peasants
- This was crucial because peasants made up 80 per cent of Russia's population
- Peasant rebellions ceased, securing the Communist government's hold on power
Industrial growth and recovery
The NEP also stimulated industrial recovery, though this was slower than agricultural recovery.
Initial recovery
- The free market encouraged increased production
- The government invested tax revenue from peasants in reopening factories closed during the Civil War
- Lenin authorised a major electrification campaign to rebuild the electricity industry
Recovery to 1913 levels
By 1926, industrial production had recovered to 1913 levels in most sectors:
- Electricity production exceeded pre-war levels
- Coal production recovered
- Grain production nearly reached 1913 levels
- However, pig iron and steel production lagged behind
Limitations of industrial growth
Despite initial success, serious problems emerged:
- Tax revenue from peasants was sufficient to reopen and modernise existing factories
- However, there was insufficient capital to build new large-scale factories
- From 1926 to 1928, the industrial economy plateaued (stopped growing)
- This limitation would become a major criticism of the NEP
The scissors crisis
One of the most serious economic problems under the NEP was the scissors crisis – named by Trotsky because the diverging lines on graphs showing agricultural and industrial prices resembled scissor blades.
What was the scissors crisis?
- Agriculture recovered much faster than industry
- Greater food supplies led to falling agricultural prices
- Industry recovered more slowly, so industrial prices rose steadily
- A growing gap opened between what farmers earned and what industrial goods cost
Understanding the Scissors Crisis (1923)
By 1923, the gap had become critical:
- Farmers could not afford to buy industrial goods
- This removed the incentive for farmers to produce large quantities of grain
- If they couldn't buy anything with their earnings, why produce surplus grain?
Government response:
- The government intervened by subsidising industrial product prices
- This made industrial goods affordable to peasants
- However, subsidies meant less money was available for economic improvement
- The scissors crisis showed radicals like Trotsky that the NEP might not be capable of proper industrialisation
Inequality and corruption
The NEP led to the re-emergence of social problems that many Communists found ideologically unacceptable.
The rise of the Nepmen
- Nepmen were traders who exploited market opportunities
- They would travel across the country transporting desirable goods from factories or farms to markets
- The Communist government viewed them as parasites who produced nothing but made profits from luxury goods
- From time to time, the secret police (Cheka) arrested Nepmen for profiteering
- However, Nepmen continued operating throughout the NEP period
- They became wealthy through trading whilst ordinary workers and peasants remained relatively poor
Growing corruption
Various forms of illegal activity flourished under the NEP:
- Gambling became widespread
- Prostitution increased (often driven by poverty, particularly among women)
- Drug dealing emerged as a problem
- These developments were deeply troubling to many Communists who had fought for a morally pure socialist society
Overall assessment: success or failure?
Successes of the NEP
Political survival
- The NEP achieved Lenin's primary goal of keeping the Communists in power
- It ended the widespread rebellions that had threatened the regime
- By replacing the deeply unpopular War Communism, it secured peasant acquiescence
Economic stabilisation
- The famine ended
- Food became widely available
- Grain production recovered to near pre-war levels
- Industrial production recovered to 1913 levels by 1926
Failures and problems of the NEP
Limited industrial growth
- Industry plateaued after 1926
- Insufficient capital to build new large-scale factories
- The economy could not generate the rapid industrialisation many Communists wanted
Economic imbalance
- The scissors crisis revealed fundamental problems in the mixed economy
- Agriculture and industry recovered at different rates
- Government intervention was needed to keep the system working
Social problems
- Inequality re-emerged with the rise of wealthy Nepmen
- Corruption, gambling, prostitution and drug dealing increased
- These developments contradicted communist ideals
Political divisions
- The NEP was deeply unpopular with many Communists
- It led to bitter debates within the Party about the correct path to socialism
- Questions about state control of industry and agriculture would dominate Communist politics in the late 1920s
Key Points to Remember:
-
The New Economic Policy (NEP) was introduced in 1921 as an "economic retreat" to prevent "political defeat" – Lenin made capitalist compromises to save Communist political power
-
The NEP created a mixed economy: free market agriculture with a tax in kind, small factories denationalised, but large industries remained nationalised, and money was reintroduced
-
The NEP successfully stabilised the economy – it ended the famine, grain production recovered to near 1913 levels, and industrial production recovered to 1913 levels by 1926
-
The scissors crisis (1923) showed the NEP's limitations – the gap between low agricultural prices and high industrial prices meant farmers couldn't afford industrial goods, requiring government intervention
-
The NEP had serious problems – industrial growth plateaued after 1926, inequality returned with wealthy Nepmen traders, and corruption increased, making the policy unpopular with many Communists