Yeltsin (Edexcel A-Level History): Revision Notes
Yeltsin
Introduction
Boris Yeltsin played a pivotal role in the collapse of the Soviet Union between 1985 and 1991. Historians have examined different aspects of his contribution, identifying several ways in which he helped to dismantle the USSR. Yeltsin's significance lies not only in his political actions but also in his ability to capitalise on popular discontent, champion nationalism, and ultimately outmanoeuvre Gorbachev to establish an independent Russia.
Yeltsin's background and early career
Boris Yeltsin (1931–2007) served as the first President of the Russian Federation following the Soviet Union's collapse. He joined the Communist Party in the early 1960s and rose through its ranks during the 1970s and early 1980s. In 1985, Gorbachev appointed him to the Central Committee, recognising his potential as a reformer.
Between 1985 and 1987, Yeltsin enthusiastically supported Gorbachev's reform programme. He became leader of the Moscow Communist Party, where he gained popularity by tackling Party corruption and challenging the privileges enjoyed by senior officials. Gorbachev also elevated him to the Politburo. However, by 1987, Yeltsin had become frustrated with what he perceived as the slow pace of reform and resigned from the Politburo in protest.
Despite losing his most important positions within the Soviet Government following clashes with Gorbachev, Yeltsin used the new democratic institutions created by Gorbachev's political reforms to rebuild his career. He was elected to the Russian Congress of People's Deputies, which became his power base for challenging the Soviet system itself.
Yeltsin as popular radical (1986–1989)
During a period when Gorbachev was becoming increasingly cautious and unpopular, Yeltsin emerged as a popular radical voice calling for more extensive reforms. His public attacks on the Party establishment helped to expose its internal divisions and erode its authority.
Twenty-Seventh Party Congress (1986)
At the Twenty-Seventh Party Congress in 1986, Yeltsin made a bold statement by publicly denouncing the privileges enjoyed by senior Party leaders. He argued for a renewed emphasis on equality and called for multi-candidate elections to all Party positions. This stance resonated with ordinary Soviet citizens who resented the elite's special status, as well as with middle and lower-ranking Party officials who saw elections as an opportunity to advance their careers.
Exposing factionalism (1987)
In 1987, Yeltsin continued his radical campaign by publicly attacking Communist officials who opposed Gorbachev's reforms. By doing so, he exposed the factionalism that existed within the Party, thereby damaging its carefully cultivated image of unity.
This public display of internal conflict weakened the Party's authority and credibility. By bringing these internal conflicts into the public arena, Yeltsin demonstrated that the Party was not the monolithic force it claimed to be.
As punishment for this challenge to Party unity, Gorbachev dismissed Yeltsin as leader of the Moscow Communist Party.
Nineteenth Party Conference (1988)
At the Nineteenth Party Conference in 1988, Yeltsin launched another televised attack on Party conservatives. This speech, broadcast to millions of Soviet viewers, further highlighted the deep ideological splits within the Communist Party leadership.
Electoral success (1989)
Yeltsin's attacks on the Party establishment between 1986 and 1988 made him extremely popular with Soviet citizens who despised the privileges of senior officials. His advocacy for multi-candidate elections also attracted support from middle and lower-ranking Party members seeking career advancement. This popularity translated into electoral success: during the 1989 Soviet elections, Yeltsin won a landslide victory in Moscow, securing an impressive 89 per cent of the vote.
Following this victory, Yeltsin became one of the founders and the leader of the Inter-regional Deputies' Group, which functioned as an opposition political party within the new parliament. From this point forward, Yeltsin established himself as Gorbachev's leading opponent, providing a focal point for those seeking more radical change.
Yeltsin in 1990: the turning point
The year 1990 marked a crucial turning point in Soviet history. It was during this year that Gorbachev lost control of the reform agenda and found himself reacting to popular protests demanding radical transformation rather than leading change.
Yeltsin's actions throughout 1990 significantly accelerated the Soviet Union's disintegration.
Chair of the Russian Congress
Elections to soviets took place across all Soviet republics during 1990. In May, Yeltsin was elected Chair of the Russian Congress of People's Deputies, Russia's new parliament. This position gave him an institutional power base from which to challenge Soviet authority.
Declaration of Russian sovereignty
In June 1990, just one month after Yeltsin became Chair, the Russian Congress declared Russia's sovereignty. In practical terms, this declaration meant that Russian laws would take precedence over Soviet laws. Whilst the Baltic republics had already declared themselves sovereign, Russia's declaration carried far greater significance because Russia contained approximately 75 per cent of the Union's population.
This declaration initiated what became known as the 'war of laws' – a series of disputes between the Russian Government and Soviet authorities over who possessed the legitimate right to govern Russia. Yeltsin also moved to establish a Russian army independent of the Soviet military and began building support for an elected Russian President, further undermining Soviet authority.
Resignation from the Communist Party
In July 1990, Yeltsin publicly resigned from the Communist Party in a highly dramatic fashion. This resignation significantly weakened support for the Party, as it symbolised a rejection of the Party by one of its most prominent members. Yeltsin's resignation formed part of a mass exodus from the Party: during 1990, Party membership plummeted from 19.2 million to 16.5 million members. Party popularity amongst the Soviet population also collapsed to a mere 18.8 per cent.
Growing popularity
Throughout 1990, Yeltsin's popularity increased as Gorbachev's policies appeared increasingly unsuccessful and confused. By June, opinion polls showed that Yeltsin had become more popular than Gorbachev amongst Russian voters. From 1990 onwards, Gorbachev adopted a more cautious approach to reform, whereas Yeltsin clearly and consistently advocated for market reform and democracy. Russian people viewed Yeltsin as one of them – someone who understood their problems and knew how to solve them. In contrast, they increasingly saw Gorbachev as distant and out of touch with the country's difficulties.
Yeltsin and nationalism
Yeltsin's attitude towards nationalism proved to be another significant factor in the Soviet Union's collapse. He actively encouraged both Russian nationalism and the independence movements of non-Russian republics, using nationalism as a tool to outmanoeuvre Gorbachev and consolidate his own power.
Embracing Russian nationalism
Yeltsin embraced Russian nationalism partly as a strategic move to undermine Gorbachev. By emphasising the rights of Russia, Yeltsin weakened the Soviet Union, which served as Gorbachev's power base.
His election as Chair of the Russian Congress symbolised the growth of Russian nationalism, as this position enabled him to speak on behalf of the Russian nation. Becoming Chair was therefore central to the process that culminated in the declaration of Russian sovereignty.
Election as Russian President
To consolidate his power base in Russia, Yeltsin stood for election as Russian President. His election to this position in June 1991 carried enormous significance: it gave him the democratic legitimacy to speak and act on behalf of Russia. Moreover, it granted him a governmental status that rivalled Gorbachev's. From this point, Gorbachev had to accept a secondary role within Russia and was forced to begin renegotiating the relationships between the republics.
Encouraging other republics' independence
Yeltsin did not limit his nationalist agenda to Russia alone. During the summer of 1990, he visited several Soviet republics, advising their leaders to "take as much sovereignty as you can swallow". This encouragement of regional independence movements directly threatened the Soviet Union's integrity.
In 1991, Yeltsin supported the Baltic states' declarations of independence from the Soviet Union. He publicly condemned the actions of Soviet troops in Vilnius, the capital of Lithuania, when they violently suppressed pro-independence protests. Gorbachev criticised Yeltsin for encouraging a 'parade of sovereignties' that threatened the Soviet Union's survival, but Yeltsin's support for nationalist movements continued regardless.
Yeltsin and the new elite
Some historians argue that the Soviet Union's break-up resulted from conflicts within the Communist Party rather than conflict between the Party and democratic reformers. From this perspective, Yeltsin's significance lies in his representation of middle-ranking Communist officials' interests against those of high-ranking officials.
Division within the Party
According to this interpretation, Gorbachev's Communist Party was never truly united. Instead, significant divisions existed between senior and lower-level Party members. Senior Communists generally wanted to preserve the Soviet Union because their status and power depended on the Communist Party and the Soviet system. Lower-ranking officials, however, viewed Gorbachev's reforms as an opportunity to improve their positions. Some Communist officials joined nationalist movements or purchased state-owned factories during the early 1990s privatisation to advance their careers and protect their power and privileges.
Champion of lower-ranking officials
Yeltsin had championed lower-ranking Party officials since the mid-1980s. Indeed, one reason for his dismissal as Moscow Party Leader in 1987 was his decision to remove established Party officials and replace them with younger members. Gorbachev criticised this as a dangerous policy of "instability of cadres".
Emergence of a counter-elite
Yeltsin's rise to power, and the growing dominance of Russia over the Soviet Union, led to the emergence of a new elite at the expense of the old Soviet elite. The statistics are revealing: of the 230 people who served as ministers under Gorbachev from 1985 to 1991, only nine remained at the top level of Yeltsin's government after the coup.
However, Yeltsin's new government did not consist primarily of entirely 'new men' – people with no government experience. Instead, almost 70 per cent of Yeltsin's new government had held middle-ranking positions in Gorbachev's government. Only around 13 per cent had been elected to any of Gorbachev's new democratic institutions.
This evidence suggests that Yeltsin contributed to the USSR's fall because he had the support of a 'counter-elite' – middle-ranking Communists who supported the Union's destruction to enhance their own power.
From this perspective, Yeltsin's power base consisted primarily of former Party officials and government officials rather than people associated with the Soviet Union's new democratic institutions.
Yeltsin, the coup and counter-coup
Yeltsin's handling of the August 1991 coup attempt proved decisive in the Soviet Union's destruction. His response to the coup transformed Soviet politics and accelerated the Union's collapse.
Transformation of strategy
The coup fundamentally changed Yeltsin's strategy. Before the coup, he had been pursuing Russian independence through incremental battles over the Union's authority. Throughout 1991, Yeltsin had been prepared for a lengthy, drawn-out struggle with Gorbachev that might last many years.
However, whilst Gorbachev failed to understand the coup's full significance and assumed he could continue with the same policies once it failed, Yeltsin immediately recognised that the coup had caused a radical shift in Soviet politics. From August 1991, Yeltsin saw an opportunity to establish Russian independence quickly and decisively.
Successful response to the coup
Yeltsin's strategy for dealing with the coup proved extremely effective. He publicly denounced the coup as unconstitutional and demanded Gorbachev's return as President. However, simultaneously, he encouraged popular uprisings against the Communist Party. Across Russia, statues of Lenin were demolished, often with the assistance of Russia's security services.
Yeltsin's response to the coup effectively constituted a counter-coup. He ordered the suspension of the Communist Party and the closure of Communist Party newspapers, including Pravda. He surrounded the Communist Party headquarters with armed police. This counter-coup proved devastatingly effective, essentially destroying the Communist Party's power in Russia.
Dismantling the Communist Party
In the weeks following the coup, Yeltsin aggressively moved to break up the Communist Party:
- At the end of August, the Communist Party was suspended across the entire Soviet Union
- In early November, Yeltsin banned the Party in Russia and seized all of its money and property
- Yeltsin published extensive evidence of Party corruption obtained from Communist Party files
- In November, Yeltsin announced that Russia was taking control of the Soviet oil and gold industries
Significantly, Yeltsin focused his attacks on the Party rather than the Union itself. However, because the Party had traditionally served as the organisation holding the Soviet Union together, Yeltsin's actions clearly weakened the already fragile Union. Only in December did Yeltsin publicly advocate ending the Union.
Slow consolidation
After the coup was crushed, Yeltsin moved surprisingly slowly to consolidate his position. He lacked a clear plan for building democracy in Russia or replacing the Soviet Union. Notably, after the coup's defeat, Yeltsin went on holiday to consider his options rather than immediately introducing reforms or demanding the Union's dissolution.
Yeltsin and the Union's end
A final perspective on Yeltsin suggests that he was crucial to the Soviet Union's demise because he could have saved it but chose not to. From this viewpoint, Gorbachev simply lacked the authority to revive negotiations for creating a new Union after the coup. Yeltsin, however, was more popular than ever and therefore could have attempted to revive the Union. Instead of supporting Gorbachev's negotiations, Yeltsin backed the creation of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS).
Abandoning the Union
Yeltsin's decision to abandon the Union was partly political, as it provided a means to defeat Gorbachev. However, it was also a decision that Yeltsin believed would benefit Russia. He calculated that reconstructing the economy would be easier for Russia alone than for the entire Union.
Russia was more economically developed than most other republics, and without having to support them, Yeltsin assumed economic reconstruction would proceed more quickly and easily. Similarly, he believed he had a better chance of establishing democracy on a national scale than across the whole Union. In this sense, he chose to build Russia rather than save the Union.
The Ukraine referendum and the CIS
Yeltsin only reached this decision in December 1991, after the people of Ukraine voted to leave the Union in a referendum. Immediately following the referendum, Yeltsin organised a secret meeting with the leaders of Ukraine and Belorussia. The three leaders agreed to support the CIS, thereby destroying Gorbachev's plan for a new Union treaty. Following the meeting, Yeltsin persuaded the leaders of the Soviet military to abandon the Soviet Union and form a new Russian army.
Historical interpretations of Yeltsin's role
Historians have debated Yeltsin's significance in the Soviet Union's fall, with different scholars emphasising various aspects of his contribution.
Peter Kenez's interpretation
Historian Peter Kenez argues that Yeltsin's actions during 1991 directly led to the Soviet Union's collapse. Kenez emphasises that Yeltsin became "the standard bearer of the reformists" and that his election as Russian President in June 1991 gave him a crucial power base. According to Kenez, under Yeltsin's leadership, "Russia began to act independently of the Soviet government, behaving as if Russia really was just one of the republics. This development, more than any other, led to the dissolution of the union."
Kenez highlights several key aspects of Yeltsin's role:
- His conflicts with conservative Communists, which increased his popularity
- His creation of the Russian presidency as a power base
- His establishment of contacts with other republics and his tolerant view of nationalist aspirations
- His public condemnation of Soviet violence in Vilnius in January 1991
George W. Breslauer's interpretation
George W. Breslauer offers a more balanced interpretation, arguing that both Yeltsin and Gorbachev played important roles in ending the Soviet Union. Breslauer acknowledges that whilst we cannot presuppose that these leaders "made all these things happen", it is fair to say that events "would have happened quite differently had different individuals been in charge. Their acts of leadership were crucial."
Breslauer emphasises that whilst earlier Soviet leaders' actions (such as Khrushchev's reformism or Brezhnev's conservatism) had precedents in Soviet history, Gorbachev's decision to transform the system and Yeltsin's decision to destroy and replace the Leninist system "were unprecedented acts by political leaders of the system itself." He argues that "one cannot explain these choices without reference to these leaders' personalities and beliefs."
Comparing the interpretations
Whilst Kenez clearly argues that Yeltsin's actions in 1991 led to the collapse, emphasising his particular importance, Breslauer takes a more balanced view, suggesting that both Gorbachev and Yeltsin were crucial. However, Breslauer still acknowledges Yeltsin's unprecedented decision to destroy the system entirely, highlighting the personal agency and individual choices that shaped these historical events.
Remember!
Key Points to Remember:
-
Yeltsin emerged as a popular radical between 1986 and 1989 by attacking Party privileges and calling for multi-candidate elections, winning 89 per cent of the vote in Moscow in 1989.
-
1990 was the crucial turning point when Yeltsin became Chair of the Russian Congress, Russia declared its sovereignty (meaning Russian laws were superior to Soviet laws), and Yeltsin resigned from the Communist Party as membership plummeted from 19.2 million to 16.5 million.
-
Yeltsin championed nationalism by embracing Russian nationalism, being elected Russian President in June 1991, and encouraging other republics to "take as much sovereignty as you can swallow", supporting Baltic independence and criticising Soviet violence in Vilnius.
-
Yeltsin represented a 'counter-elite' of middle-ranking Communist officials who saw the Union's destruction as an opportunity to enhance their power; almost 70 per cent of his government had held middle-ranking positions under Gorbachev.
-
Yeltsin's response to the August 1991 coup was decisive: he organised a counter-coup by suspending the Communist Party, closing Party newspapers, seizing Party property, and publishing evidence of corruption, essentially destroying the Party's power in Russia.
-
Yeltsin chose to abandon the Union rather than save it after the Ukraine referendum in December 1991, organising a secret meeting with Ukraine and Belorussia leaders to support the CIS, believing Russia would be better off economically and politically as an independent nation rather than part of a reformed Union.