Damages (AQA A-Level Law): Revision Notes
Damages
Introduction to damages in tort
Damages are the primary remedy in tort law and represent monetary compensation awarded to a successful claimant. This area of law will be assessed in Paper 2, where you will need to apply damages principles to scenario-based questions alongside the relevant substantive tort (such as negligence, nuisance, or trespass).
It is important to distinguish between 'damage' and 'damages'. Damage refers to the harm or loss that the tort has caused, while damages refer to the monetary compensation awarded for that harm.
Compensatory damages
Purpose of compensatory damages
The fundamental aim of damages in tort is to achieve restitutio in integrum, a Latin phrase meaning to restore the claimant to the position they would have been in if the tort had not been committed, as far as money can achieve this.
The Restitutio in Integrum Principle
The core principle of compensatory damages is financial restoration - putting the injured party back in the position they would have occupied if the tort had never occurred. This is established in Livingstone v Rawyards Coal Company (1880), where Lord Blackburn stated that damages should enable you to arrive at a sum of money which will place the injured party in the same position as if they had not sustained the wrong.
However, the courts have acknowledged the inherent limitations of monetary compensation. In British Transport Commission v Gourley (1956), the court recognised that no amount of money can truly compensate someone for grievous injuries. Instead, judges must endeavour to arrive at a fair estimate by taking into account all relevant considerations, known as the heads of damage.
The heads of damage serve as categories under which different types of loss can be assessed and calculated. These are divided into general damages and special damages.
Physical injury to people
This category encompasses all types of personal injury claims, including both physical injuries and, where the claim has been successful, psychiatric harm.
General damages
General damages are described as unliquidated or non-pecuniary, meaning they cannot be calculated with mathematical precision. The judge exercises discretion in determining the appropriate amount to award based on the circumstances of each case.
General damages are awarded for the following categories:
Pain and suffering: This head of damage covers past, present, and future physical pain and mental anguish. It includes distress caused by the fear of future medical treatment or anguish arising from a shortened life expectancy. However, a crucial requirement established in Wise v Kaye (1962) is that the claimant must be consciously aware of their injuries. In that case, the claimant was left permanently unconscious and could not claim for pain and suffering during the period of unconsciousness because she had no awareness of her condition.
Loss of amenity: This compensates claimants for the loss of things they previously enjoyed doing. Examples include the loss of particular skills or hobbies, diminished senses (such as sight or hearing), and even reduced marriage prospects where the injury has affected the claimant's personal life.
Future loss: This category covers anticipated future losses such as pension rights and future expenses, including the cost of nursing care, medical treatment, and adapted accommodation.
Standard Tariffs for Injuries
For most types of injuries, there exists a standard tariff provided by the Judicial Studies Board, published in the Kemp and Kemp Quantum of Damages. This guidance helps ensure consistency in awards for similar injuries, making the system more predictable and fair.
Specific injuries: For most types of injuries, there exists a standard tariff provided by the Judicial Studies Board, published in the Kemp and Kemp Quantum of Damages. This guidance helps ensure consistency in awards for similar injuries.
Special damages
Unlike general damages, special damages represent losses that can be assessed with reasonable accuracy. These are liquidated damages where the precise financial loss can be calculated.
Special damages typically include:
Medical expenses: Claimants can recover the cost of private medical treatment, not just NHS treatment. This recognises that claimants should not be limited to only publicly funded healthcare.
Loss of earnings: The treatment of loss of earnings depends on when the loss occurred. Pre-trial loss of earnings falls under special damages because the exact amount can be calculated by reference to the claimant's actual lost income up to the trial date.
Calculation of post-trial loss of earnings
Post-trial loss of earnings is treated as general damages because it is impossible to predict with certainty how much the claimant would have earned in the future. To address this uncertainty, the courts have developed a formula:
Formula for Future Loss of Earnings
Where:
- The multiplicand represents the court's assessment of the claimant's net annual loss (the amount the claimant would have earned each year after tax and other deductions)
- The multiplier represents the period of future loss, calculated using actuarial tables that account for various uncertainties, including the possibility that the claimant might not have remained in employment for their entire working life even without the injury
Note: The multiplier is NOT simply the number of years until retirement - it is a more sophisticated calculation based on actuarial evidence.
Where the claimant's life expectancy has been shortened by the accident, the calculation of future loss of earnings must be adjusted accordingly. The leading case on this point is Pickett v British Rail Engineering Ltd (1980), where a 51-year-old claimant who inhaled asbestos developed mesothelioma with a life expectancy of only one year. Damages were nevertheless calculated on the basis that he would have been expected to work until 65 years old, ensuring he was compensated for the full loss of his working life.
Pre-trial expenses
Claimants may recover special damages for various expenses incurred between the date of injury and the trial date. These expenses must be reasonably incurred and causally connected to the tort. Common examples include medical expenses (whether NHS or private), travel costs to attend medical appointments, the cost of medication, and expenses for adapting the home or vehicle to accommodate disabilities.
Damage to property
When property is destroyed completely, damages are generally assessed by reference to the market value of the property at the time of its destruction. This reflects the principle that the claimant should be placed in the position they would have been in had the tort not occurred.
Where property is damaged but not completely destroyed, damages are usually assessed by reference to the cost of repair. However, if the repair cost exceeds the market value of the property, then the market value is used instead. This prevents claimants from recovering more than the actual value of the property and ensures the defendant is not required to pay for betterment.
Property Damage Assessment Rule
Think of it as "Market or Mend":
- Complete destruction → Use market value
- Repairable damage → Use repair cost (but capped at market value if repairs would cost more than the property is worth)
Economic loss
Pure economic loss (financial loss with no accompanying physical injury or property damage) is notoriously difficult to claim in tort, particularly in negligence. However, in the very few cases where such a claim succeeds, the loss can typically be calculated exactly, making it a form of special damages.
More commonly, economic loss arises as a consequence of personal injury or property damage. For example, loss of earnings following a personal injury claim falls into this category. Such consequential economic loss is more readily recoverable and, because it can be calculated precisely, will be included in the overall damages award.
Interim and periodical payments
While damages are traditionally awarded as a lump sum payment, the law recognises that this approach may not always be appropriate, particularly in cases involving catastrophic injuries or long-term care needs.
Interim payments
Part 25 of the Civil Procedure Rules provides for interim payments, which are payments made before the full settlement is awarded. These are most commonly used in personal injury claims, especially where the claim involves substantial damages arising from catastrophic injuries.
In such cases, the claimant may require immediate financial resources before the final calculation of damages is complete. Interim payments enable claimants to pay for urgent necessities such as adapted housing, specialist equipment, or expensive medical care and rehabilitation without having to wait until the case concludes.
Periodical payments
Section 2 of the Damages Act 1996 provides courts with the power to order that damages for future pecuniary loss in personal injury cases should take the form of periodical payments. This means regular payments made to the claimant over time rather than a single lump sum.
Advantages of Periodical Payments
Periodical payments are particularly appropriate where the claimant faces ongoing expenses, such as the cost of lifelong care. They provide several benefits:
- More secure form of compensation than a lump sum
- Eliminate the risk that the claimant might exhaust their damages through poor investment
- Protection against inflation eroding the value of the award over time
Types of damages (other than compensatory)
Beyond compensatory damages, which form the vast majority of damages awards in tort, there exist several other types of damages that serve different purposes.
Nominal damages
Nominal damages are token awards, often as little as $1, paid when the court finds that a tort has been committed but the claimant has suffered no actual loss or damage. Such awards vindicate the claimant's legal rights even though no financial loss has occurred. For example, in a trespass to land case, a claimant might receive nominal damages even though the trespass caused no physical damage to the property.
Contemptuous damages
Contemptuous damages are awarded where the court considers that the action should never have been brought, often because the claimant's own behaviour has been reprehensible or because the claim is trivial. Like nominal damages, these are very small sums, but they carry the additional message that the court disapproves of the claimant bringing the case. A claimant who receives contemptuous damages may be at risk of having to pay the defendant's legal costs despite technically winning the case.
Aggravated damages
Aggravated damages may be awarded when the court determines that the claimant's injury has been made worse by the defendant's conduct. This might occur where the defendant has behaved in a particularly high-handed, malicious, or oppressive manner. Aggravated damages increase the compensatory award to reflect the additional harm caused by the defendant's behaviour, such as increased humiliation, distress, or injury to feelings.
Mitigation of loss
The Duty to Mitigate
A fundamental principle of damages law is that claimants must take reasonable steps to mitigate their loss. This means the claimant should do what is reasonably possible to minimise the financial consequences of the defendant's tort.
The defendant will not be held liable for losses that result from the claimant's unreasonable failure to mitigate. For example, if a claimant suffers an injury that could be substantially improved by undergoing reasonable medical treatment, and the claimant unreasonably refuses such treatment, the defendant might not be liable for the additional loss caused by the failure to undergo treatment.
However, what constitutes 'reasonable' steps depends on all the circumstances. A claimant is not required to take unreasonable risks, undergo dangerous procedures, or incur substantial expense to mitigate their loss.
Key cases on damages
Case Example: British Transport Commission v Gourley (1956)
Facts: An eminent civil engineer suffered severe injuries while travelling on a train.
Relevant area: Restitutio in integrum
Legal principle: The court acknowledged that no monetary award can truly compensate for grievous injuries, but judges must endeavour to arrive at a fair estimate considering all relevant factors. This case established the practical limitations of the restitutio in integrum principle.
Case Example: Wise v Kaye (1962)
Facts: The claimant was left permanently unconscious and unaware of her surroundings following an accident.
Relevant area: Pain and suffering
Legal principle: A claimant can only claim damages for pain and suffering if they are consciously aware of their injuries (subjective test). There was no claim for the period when the claimant was unconscious. This establishes that awareness is a prerequisite for this type of damage.
Case Example: Pickett v British Rail Engineering Ltd (1980)
Facts: A 51-year-old claimant inhaled asbestos, causing mesothelioma with a life expectancy of one year.
Relevant area: Reduced life expectancy
Legal principle: Damages for loss of earnings were calculated on the basis that the claimant would have been expected to work until 65 years old, compensating him for the full loss of his working life. This ensures that claimants with shortened life expectancy are not unfairly disadvantaged in their damages calculation.
Injunctions
An injunction is a court order that either prevents a defendant from doing something (a prohibitory injunction) or compels a defendant to do something (a mandatory injunction). Unlike damages, which are awarded as of right when a claimant succeeds, injunctions are equitable remedies granted at the discretion of the court.
Injunctions are most commonly used in torts such as nuisance and trespass to prevent the continuation of tortious conduct. For example, in a private nuisance case involving noise pollution, the court might grant an injunction ordering the defendant to cease the noise-creating activity, rather than simply awarding damages.
The availability of an injunction depends on several factors:
- The severity of the harm
- Whether damages would be an adequate remedy
- The balance of hardship between the parties
- The conduct of both parties
Remember!
Key Points to Remember:
-
Restitutio in integrum means putting the claimant back in the position they would have been in if the tort had not occurred, as far as money can achieve this.
-
General damages are unliquidated (non-pecuniary) and cannot be calculated exactly; they cover pain and suffering, loss of amenity, future loss, and specific injuries.
-
Special damages are liquidated and can be calculated accurately; they include medical expenses and pre-trial loss of earnings.
-
Post-trial loss of earnings is calculated using the formula:
-
Claimants have a duty to mitigate their loss by taking reasonable steps to minimise the financial consequences of the tort; defendants are not liable for losses resulting from unreasonable failure to mitigate.
-
Interim payments provide immediate financial resources before final settlement, while periodical payments offer regular payments over time for long-term needs.
-
Beyond compensatory damages, courts may award nominal damages (token amounts), contemptuous damages (showing disapproval), or aggravated damages (for defendant's particularly bad conduct).