Gorbachev’s Early Political Reforms, 1985–86 (Edexcel A-Level History): Revision Notes
Gorbachev's Early Political Reforms, 1985–86
Introduction: Gorbachev's initial reform aims
When Mikhail Gorbachev became General Secretary in 1985, he believed the Soviet system could be reformed whilst maintaining communist control. His original plans were relatively modest and cautious. Gorbachev wanted to:
- Encourage more open debate within the Communist Party
- Grant intellectuals greater freedom of expression
- Increase public access to information
These reforms triggered consequences that Gorbachev had not anticipated. Rather than simply modernising the system, reform created mounting pressure for more fundamental change that would ultimately transform Soviet society far beyond his original intentions.
A generational shift in Soviet leadership
Gorbachev's appointment marked a significant generational shift in Soviet leadership. At 54 years old, he was 20 years younger than his predecessor, Konstantin Chernenko. This age gap represented more than just numbers – it symbolised a deeper divide in political experience and outlook.
Whereas previous leaders Chernenko, Andropov and Brezhnev had all been born before the 1917 Revolution, Gorbachev belonged to a different era. He was born in 1931, during Stalin's reign. This meant Gorbachev had no personal memory of pre-revolutionary Russia and had been shaped by different historical experiences than the old guard.
The generational divide was crucial: Gorbachev's generation had grown up entirely within the Soviet system, experiencing its evolution firsthand. Unlike the old guard who remembered life before the Revolution, Gorbachev and his contemporaries only knew the Soviet reality, making them more willing to consider fundamental reforms to a system they had witnessed stagnating.
Personnel changes: building a team of reformers
Gorbachev's first priority as General Secretary was replacing senior officials who had close ties to Brezhnev. This served two purposes:
- Ending stagnation: Removing the old guard would help overcome the political and economic stagnation of the Brezhnev era
- Building authority through patronage: By appointing his own supporters, Gorbachev strengthened his personal power base
Key appointments
Gorbachev promoted younger communists who supported reform to senior positions:
- Nikolai Ryzhkov became Prime Minister
- Viktor Chebrikov was appointed head of the KGB (Soviet security service)
- Egor Ligachev joined the Politburo (the Communist Party's main decision-making body)
- Boris Yeltsin became head of the Communist Party of Moscow (December 1985)
Key removals
At the same time, officials closely associated with Brezhnev were removed:
- Andrei Gromyko (former Foreign Minister)
- Viktor Grishin (Moscow Party boss)
The significance of these changes
These personnel changes were important because they placed reform-minded communists in positions of power. However, many of Gorbachev's appointees, including Ryzhkov, actually supported continuing and extending Andropov's reforms rather than implementing anything more radical.
Indeed, throughout 1985 and 1986, Gorbachev's policies closely resembled a continuation of the initiatives started by his predecessor Andropov. This reveals that Gorbachev's early reforms were evolutionary rather than revolutionary in nature.
From economic to political reform
During his first year as General Secretary, Gorbachev concentrated primarily on economic reform. However, as these economic reforms failed to achieve the desired results, Gorbachev became convinced that political reform was essential to revive the Soviet economy.
Why political reform became necessary
Gorbachev identified two main obstacles to successful economic reform:
First obstacle: Traditionalist opposition
Conservative Communist officials were blocking his reforms because they remained committed to old-fashioned economic methods. These traditionalists preferred established practices and resisted new approaches.
Second obstacle: Over-centralisation and data manipulation
The Soviet economy was excessively centralised, meaning decisions were made at the top with little local input. This created serious problems because accurate information – which was vital for effective economic planning – was almost impossible to obtain. Officials routinely manipulated economic data, distorting the true picture of economic performance.
Democratisation and openness: Gorbachev's solutions
To overcome these obstacles, Gorbachev proposed two interconnected solutions: democratisation and openness. These twin approaches would become the foundation of his reform programme.
Democratisation
Gorbachev hoped that democratisation would achieve several goals:
- Limiting traditionalist power: By making the system more democratic, he could reduce the influence of conservative officials who opposed reform
- Speeding up economic reform: With traditionalists sidelined, economic changes could be implemented more quickly
- Ending strict centralisation: Democratisation would transfer some power away from central authorities and towards ordinary people
- Empowering the population: Passing power to the people would create a new dynamic in Soviet politics
Openness
Openness (later called glasnost) was designed to address the problem of manipulated economic data:
- By committing to openness and truthfulness, Gorbachev hoped to end the distortion of economic information
- Accurate data would enable more effective economic planning
- Openness would support economic recovery by ensuring decisions were based on reality rather than falsified statistics
The introduction of glasnost, 1986
Early references to openness
Gorbachev spoke repeatedly about the need for government to admit the truth. He first mentioned the importance of openness in December 1974, long before becoming General Secretary. The term glasnost (meaning openness or transparency) had also been used from 1983 onwards by supporters of Andropov, who wanted to expose corruption within the Party.
Initial meaning
Initially, glasnost was primarily a commitment to being open about the state of the Soviet economy. It focused specifically on honest economic reporting rather than broader political or social openness.
The evolution of glasnost from a narrow economic concept to a broader cultural and political movement represents one of the most significant unintended consequences of Gorbachev's reforms. What began as a practical tool for economic transparency became a catalyst for fundamental social change.
Glasnost becomes increasingly important from 1986
From 1986 onwards, glasnost became a more significant initiative in Gorbachev's reform programme. This development was partly driven by the opposition Gorbachev faced within the Communist Party.
Hardline communists – conservative Party members who strongly opposed Gorbachev's reforms – created resistance to change. Facing this internal opposition, Gorbachev looked for support from outside the traditional Party structure.
Seeking allies among intellectuals
Gorbachev actively invited writers and intellectuals to criticise the hardliners and support his reforms. He believed that intellectuals, writers and artists were natural allies who would help him challenge conservative Party members. Unlike Party traditionalists, these cultural figures were more likely to embrace new ideas and support modernisation.
This strategy marked an important shift: Gorbachev was building a coalition that extended beyond the Communist Party itself, seeking popular and intellectual support to overcome resistance from within the Party apparatus. This represented a fundamental break with Soviet tradition, where all political activity had been confined within Party structures.
Key Points to Remember:
-
Gorbachev initially planned limited reforms: more Party debate, greater freedom for intellectuals, and increased public access to information, but these reforms had unforeseen consequences
-
His appointment represented a generational shift – he was 20 years younger than Chernenko and born during Stalin's reign rather than before the Revolution
-
Gorbachev replaced Brezhnev-era officials with younger, reform-minded communists like Ryzhkov, Chebrikov, Ligachev and Yeltsin, whilst removing Gromyko and Grishin
-
When economic reforms failed, Gorbachev concluded that political reform was essential, as traditionalists were blocking change and the over-centralised system produced inaccurate economic data
-
Democratisation and openness were Gorbachev's solutions: democratisation would limit traditionalist power and reduce centralisation, whilst openness would end the distortion of economic information
-
Glasnost (openness) became increasingly important from 1986, initially focusing on honest economic reporting but expanding as Gorbachev sought support from intellectuals and writers to counter hardline opposition within the Party