Why be Moral? (Leaving Cert Religious Education): Revision Notes
The Common Good
What is the common good?
The common good refers to the wellbeing and interests of society as a whole, rather than just individual people or groups. This concept has deep philosophical roots, with ancient Greek philosopher Plato arguing that the ideal state should aim for the greatest possible happiness of the city as a whole rather than benefiting just one particular class or group.
Plato's Foundation
Plato established the philosophical foundation for the common good concept, arguing that the ideal state should prioritise collective happiness over the interests of any single class or group. This ancient principle continues to influence modern legal systems today.
In practical terms, the common good represents what benefits the largest number of people in society. However, this doesn't mean individual rights are ignored - instead, there needs to be a careful balance between protecting personal freedoms and serving the broader community interest.
Two key definitions emerge from this understanding:
- The common good means providing the greatest amount of benefit for the largest number of people
- It represents the collective wellbeing that sometimes requires individuals to accept limitations on their personal rights
Constitutional foundations in Irish law
The principle of balancing individual rights with the common good is deeply embedded in Irish legal tradition. When Éamon de Valera was developing the Irish Constitution (Bunreacht na hÉireann) in 1937, he emphasised to the Dáil that laws should properly coordinate individual rights with community values.
Constitutional Requirement
The Irish Constitution doesn't just suggest balancing individual and community interests - it requires it. This means every law in Ireland must consider both personal freedoms and the common good, making this balance a legal obligation rather than just a moral principle.
This constitutional foundation means that all Irish laws are built on the requirement to balance personal freedoms against the broader public interest. Article 26 of the Offences against the State Act of 1940 explicitly states that individual rights cannot be protected unless social order is maintained - in other words, the common good must be served.
The Irish Constitution serves as the fundamental legal document for the state, which means this balancing principle influences all aspects of Irish civil law. Rather than giving absolute priority to either individual rights or collective interests, Irish law seeks to find a middle ground that respects both.
How individual rights are balanced with the common good
Irish civil law operates on the principle that individual rights are important and should be protected, but they have natural limits. Citizens can exercise their rights freely until doing so begins to impact negatively on other people's rights or the wider community's wellbeing.
The Balancing Principle
Irish law rejects both extremes: complete individual freedom (which could lead to chaos) and complete suppression of rights (which would create oppression). Instead, it seeks a balanced approach where rights are protected but can be limited when necessary for the common good.
This approach recognises that complete individual freedom could lead to chaos and harm, while completely suppressing individual rights would create an oppressive society. Instead, Irish law seeks a balanced approach where:
- People's fundamental rights are recognised and protected
- These rights can be exercised freely in normal circumstances
- Limitations may be placed on rights when exercising them would harm others or damage the common good
- Any restrictions must be justified by genuine community needs rather than arbitrary decisions
This balancing act appears throughout Irish civil law, from property rights to freedom of expression, and requires courts to carefully weigh individual interests against broader social concerns.
Case studies from Irish civil law
The following landmark cases demonstrate how Irish courts apply the common good principle in practice, showing the complex balance between individual compensation rights and broader community interests.
Worked Example: The Derrynaflan Hoard Case
Background: In 1981, Michael Webb and his son discovered a priceless 9th-century chalice and other mediaeval artefacts while metal detecting near old church ruins in County Tipperary.
The Conflict: When the National Museum requested the items, the Webbs initially received an offer of £10,000 compensation, which they rejected as inadequate. A court initially awarded them £5.5 million in 1986.
Community Impact: This decision caused public outrage during Ireland's severe financial difficulties, with critics arguing the state shouldn't pay enormous sums during cuts to education and health services.
Final Resolution: In 1987, a higher court reduced compensation to £50,000, balancing:
- The Webbs' right to fair compensation (upheld)
- Preventing financial damage to a struggling country
- Preserving national heritage affordably
- Serving the common good without worsening public services
Worked Example: The Barbato Borza Case
Background: Mr Barbato Borza purchased a shop in Tallaght town centre for approximately £36,000 in early 1988.
The Conflict: In 1997, South Dublin County Council used compulsory purchase powers to acquire his property (valued at £99,000), then demolished the shopping centre for road widening and property development.
Individual vs Community Interests:
- Borza had legitimate ownership rights and deserved fair compensation
- The council had authority to acquire property for genuine public purposes
- Questions arose about fairness when the council also profited from redevelopment
- Individual property rights had to be weighed against community infrastructure needs
Legal Principle: This case demonstrates the complexity of applying common good principles when public authorities may have mixed motives beyond pure community benefit.
Key Points to Remember:
-
The common good means the greatest benefit for the largest number of people, but individual rights still matter and must be protected within reasonable limits
-
Irish law is built on balancing individual freedoms with community wellbeing - neither takes absolute priority over the other
-
The Irish Constitution embeds this balancing requirement into all Irish civil law, making it a fundamental principle rather than just a policy choice
-
Real legal cases like the Derrynaflan Hoard show how courts must weigh fair individual compensation against protecting the broader community from financial harm
-
The balance between individual rights and common good requires ongoing judgement calls - there's rarely a simple answer that satisfies everyone completely