Ethical Influences (HSC SSCE Business Studies): Revision Notes
Ethical Influences
Introduction to ethical influences in marketing
Marketing involves both ethical and legal dilemmas. While laws set legal standards, ethical standards are harder to define. Ethical behaviour refers to conduct that goes beyond legal requirements. Some marketing strategies may be legal but are still considered unethical or morally wrong.
The distinction between legal and ethical is crucial: something can be perfectly legal yet still considered unethical by society. Businesses must navigate both legal requirements and ethical expectations to maintain their reputation.
Businesses must balance profit-making objectives with their responsibility to consumers, society, and competitors. Understanding ethical influences helps businesses maintain their reputation and customer trust while operating within acceptable social norms.
Ethical criticisms of marketing
Critics argue that the marketing industry does not always adopt ethical practices and often blurs the line between right and wrong. The main ethical criticisms include:
Creation of needs — materialism
Materialism is an individual's desire to constantly acquire possessions. Critics believe businesses use sophisticated promotional strategies to persuade and manipulate customers to buy products they don't need.
Large businesses particularly use powerful advertising techniques to create artificial needs and wants. This can lead to:
- Excessive consumer spending
- Financial stress for individuals and families
- Environmental damage from overproduction and waste
- Focus on possessions rather than wellbeing
Marketing creates a culture where consumers feel they need the latest products to be successful, happy, or accepted by society. This constant cycle of desire and consumption raises questions about the social responsibility of marketing practices.
Use of stereotyping
Stereotyping occurs when groups of people are portrayed in ways that don't fully represent reality. Common examples include:
- Gender stereotypes: Women shown cooking, cleaning, or caring for children; men shown using power tools or watching sport
- Racial stereotypes: Depicting certain ethnicities in limited or stereotypical roles
- Age stereotypes: Portraying groups like children or elderly people in narrow ways
Research shows advertising continues to reinforce outdated gender stereotypes from the 1950s. For example, brands overwhelmingly show women seeking knowledge to cook, care and clean, while men are occasionally depicted as incompetent when using domestic products.
Case Study: Sofitel Hotels Advertisement
A Sofitel Hotels advertisement showed a man reading the Australian Financial Review and a woman looking at a Chanel book, reinforcing stereotypes about gender and interests. The company apologised and removed the ad after public criticism.
The UK introduced laws in 2019 banning gender-stereotypical activities in advertising. One banned ad featured fathers who couldn't care for their babies properly, perpetuating harmful stereotypes that men are incapable of childcare.
Use of sex to sell products
Marketers often overuse sexual themes and connotations to sell products. This practice:
- Portrays unrealistic images as attainable
- Suggests products will increase the user's attractiveness or charm
- Can have subtle but persuasive impacts on consumer behaviour
- Objectifies people, particularly women
While many consumers are sceptical of such claims, sex appeal in advertising remains common because it attracts attention and creates emotional responses.
Product placement
Product placement is the inclusion of advertising in entertainment. This involves inserting branded products into TV shows, movies, or other media content.
Product placement can be:
- Subtle: An actor driving a specific car brand or using a particular phone
- Prominent: Products displayed clearly in the foreground
Businesses use this technique to reach consumers who have become resistant to traditional advertising. However, critics argue that:
- It blurs the line between advertising and entertainment
- Consumers may not recognise they're being marketed to
- It's a concealed form of advertising that lacks transparency
Case Study: James Bond and BMW

James Bond films are known for product placement. BMW paid $3 million to have their Z3 car appear in GoldenEye, resulting in a $240 million increase in sales. This demonstrates the powerful impact of product placement on consumer purchasing behaviour.
Invasion of privacy
Online advertising has raised serious ethical concerns, particularly regarding tracking web users and using their data for targeted advertising. This may breach consumer privacy.
Key Privacy Concerns:
- Websites collect data on browsing habits without explicit consent
- Most websites use "inferred consent" (consumers must actively opt out)
- Many consumers are unaware their data is being collected
- Behavioural data is collected and resold by data exchange companies
- Businesses use this data for targeted advertising
Real-World Impact: Loyalty Cards
Loyalty cards collect detailed information on individual buying habits. Many consumers don't realise they're trading privacy for rewards when they use these cards. Every purchase is tracked, analysed, and potentially sold to third parties for marketing purposes.
Truth and accuracy in advertising
Advertising is a paid, non-personal message communicated through a mass medium. Ethical businesses must ensure their advertising is truthful, as they can be held morally responsible for misleading the public.
When consumers discover advertisements are untrue or inaccurate, they may:
- Feel cheated and stop buying the product
- Complain to government agencies
- Damage the business's reputation through negative word-of-mouth
Main unethical marketing practices relating to truth and accuracy include untruths due to concealed facts, exaggerated claims, and vague statements. Each of these practices can severely damage consumer trust and business reputation.
Untruths due to concealed facts
Concealed facts are pieces of information purposely omitted from an advertisement. While advertising naturally emphasises positive aspects, deliberately hiding important information is unethical.
This practice can severely harm customer trust when the truth emerges. Consumers expect complete and honest information to make informed purchasing decisions.
Exaggerated claims — puffery
Puffery refers to exaggerated claims used for promotional purposes that no reasonable person would take as factual. It is not misleading or deceptive if the audience could not reasonably be misled.
Acceptable puffery example: A café advertising "the best coffee in town" — reasonable consumers recognise this as promotional language, not a factual claim.
Unacceptable exaggeration example: A sparkling mineral water brand advertising bubbles as "natural" when they were actually added during bottling. This was found to be misleading.
Case Study: Streets Ice-Cream Slogan
Streets ice-cream used the slogan "ICE CREAM MAKES U HAPPY". A complaint argued this was socially irresponsible given obesity concerns. Initially upheld, the decision was reversed on appeal because the slogan was considered puffery that no reasonable person would interpret as a nutritional claim.
Key Learning: The line between acceptable puffery and misleading advertising depends on whether a reasonable consumer would rely on the statement when making a purchase decision.
Vague statements
Vague statements use deliberately ambiguous language that allows consumers to assume the advertiser's intended message. These "weasel words" let marketers deny any intention to mislead.
Common Weasel Words:
- "Helps" (as in "helps fight against" or "helps restore")
- "Up to" (suggesting maximum benefits that may not be typical)
- "May" (indicating possibility rather than certainty)
- "Special", "great value", "low fat", "light", "once in a lifetime"
These terms can be interpreted in many ways, making it difficult for consumers to understand what they're actually getting. While some marketers regard such statements as acceptable, others view them as unethical.
Good taste in advertising
What constitutes "good taste" is highly subjective — some consumers find certain advertisements offensive while others don't. Marketers must be aware of community sensitivities and social norms.
However, some marketers deliberately push boundaries to create attention and controversy. This can backfire when:
- Complaints are made to advertising standards bodies
- Negative publicity damages the brand
- Consumers boycott products
- The advertisement must be withdrawn
Case Study: Sportsbet's "Manscaping" Advertisement
In 2018, Sportsbet's "manscaping" ad received 793 complaints, setting the record for the most complained-about advertisement in Ad Standards' 20-year history. The ad showed a man shaving his genitals and was deemed to breach Section 2.4 of the AANA Code of Ethics for inappropriate content.
Sexualisation of children
One particularly serious concern is the sexualisation of children in advertising. According to the Australia Institute, premature sexualisation of children in media can lead to:
Serious Consequences of Child Sexualisation:
- Increased risk of depression
- Self-esteem and identity disorders
- Premature sexual activity
Case Study: KFC Advertisement Controversy
A KFC advertisement showed young boys staring at a woman adjusting her cleavage. Critics argued this:
- Objectified women for male viewing
- Groomed young boys to view women as sexual objects
- Reinforced the "boys will be boys" stereotype
- Contributed to attitudes underlying gender inequality and violence
While KFC apologised, the controversy highlighted ongoing concerns about gender stereotypes and sexual objectification in advertising.
Marketing to children
Advertisers and marketers now target children more than ever through:
- Television commercials during children's viewing times
- Social media platforms (Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat)
- Smartphone apps and games
- Product packaging with cartoon characters
There is growing recognition that children are vulnerable consumers with reduced capacity to understand commercial and persuasive intent. Targeting children through fun advertisements and engaging characters builds positive brand associations that can last into adulthood.
Products that may damage health
All consumer products must be safe and meet consumer guarantees under the Australian Consumer Law (ACL). Businesses cannot sell banned products and must ensure products comply with mandatory safety standards.
Consumer protection measures
Key Protections:
- Consumer guarantees: Give people the right to a refund if a product is unsafe
- Compensation: Consumers can seek damages for losses caused by safety defects
- Mandatory recalls: Products that may cause injury must be recalled
- Mandatory reporting: Businesses must report deaths, serious injuries, or illnesses associated with their products within two days
Generally, manufacturers are liable for damages, but if retailers cannot identify the manufacturer, they may be held liable.
Marketing of junk food
The marketing of junk food has been heavily criticised by nutritionists and health advocates, especially as childhood obesity rates reach epidemic proportions.
Problems with junk food marketing include:
- Products portrayed as essential parts of a balanced diet
- Terms like "low fat", "reduced fat", "fat free", or "light" can be misleading (these products often contain added sugar and chemicals)
- Extensive advertising creates demand for unhealthy products
- Children are particularly vulnerable to these marketing messages
Case Study: Parents' Voice Fame & Shame Awards (2019)
- Kellogg's won the "pester power" award for packaging targeting children for unhealthy options
- PepsiCo was shamed for billboards bombarding kids with unhealthy food advertising
- McDonald's was shamed for Happy Meal social media ads and apps
These awards highlight how major food companies continue to aggressively market unhealthy products to vulnerable young consumers.
Self-regulatory codes
Industry has established codes to regulate junk food marketing to children:
- Responsible Children's Marketing Initiative (RCMI)
- Quick Service Restaurant Initiative (QSRI)
However, these codes have significant limitations:
Major Flaws in Self-Regulatory Codes:
- Only cover advertisements during designated children's programs
- Don't cover popular shows that children watch (like Neighbours or Home & Away)
- Have loose definitions that allow unhealthy products to be marketed as "healthier choices"
- Interpretation has been weakened over time
Example: Kellogg's can categorise Coco Pops as a "healthier dietary choice" under current definitions, making it acceptable for marketing to children.
Around 40% of what Australian school-aged children eat is unhealthy food. The millions of dollars companies spend creating demand for these products is a marketing success but a public health failure.
Government restrictions
Current government restrictions in Australia:
- No advertising during programs for pre-school children
- Queensland banned outdoor junk food advertising at government-owned sites in 2019
- Limited regulation of digital marketing through apps and social media
Health organisations, including the World Health Organization (WHO), acknowledge that restricting junk food marketing to children is necessary to improve diets and slow obesity rates.
Engaging in fair competition
Competition in the marketplace is essential for a healthy economy. Businesses compete to attract customers, increase sales revenue, and maximise profit. However, intense competition can tempt businesses to engage in unfair marketing strategies.
The Competition and Consumer Act 2010 requires businesses to compete fairly. Part IV of the Act aims to deter anti-competitive behaviour that limits or prevents competition.
Types of prohibited anti-competitive conduct
Cartel conduct
A cartel exists when two or more competing businesses agree to act together. The Act prohibits businesses from making agreements to:
- Fix prices: Agreeing to set identical prices for products
- Rig bids: Communicating before lodging bids to agree who will win and at what price
- Share markets: Dividing up markets or customers among competitors
- Restrict outputs: Limiting production to keep prices high
These agreements are designed to increase cartel members' profits while putting other companies out of business. Cartels harm consumers through higher prices and reduced choice.
Case Study: Airline Cartel Conduct
In 2019, Garuda Indonesia was ordered to pay a $19 million penalty for colluding on fees and surcharges for air freight services. A global air cargo cartel involving 14 airlines, including Qantas, Air New Zealand, and Cathay Pacific, was penalised a combined $132.5 million.
Anti-competitive agreements
Contracts or arrangements containing provisions that substantially lessen competition in a market are prohibited. This prevents businesses from making deals that reduce competitive pressure and harm consumers.
Misuse of market power
The Act prohibits businesses with substantial market power from engaging in conduct that has the purpose, or effect, of substantially lessening competition. Businesses must not take advantage of their power to:
- Damage or eliminate a competitor
- Prevent anyone from competing in a market
- Prevent a competitor from entering a market
Case Study: Woolworths Liquor Licences
Woolworths was fined $7 million for attempting to prevent restaurants and bars from selling packaged liquor in competition with its liquor outlets. When these businesses applied for liquor licences, Woolworths lodged objections and proposed to withdraw them if the businesses agreed not to sell take-away alcohol.
Exclusive dealing
Exclusive dealing occurs when one business trades with another and imposes restrictions on them. For example, a hair products supplier will only sell to a hairdresser on condition the hairdresser doesn't purchase from other suppliers.
This can be legal if it doesn't substantially lessen competition:
- McDonald's sells Coca-Cola but not Pepsi (legal because KFC sells Pepsi but not Coke)
- The overall market for soft drinks remains competitive
Businesses wishing to enter such arrangements must notify the ACCC, which will examine the details before approving or disallowing the arrangement.
Resale price maintenance
Resale price maintenance occurs when a supplier sets the price at which retailers must sell products. The law states:
- Suppliers can recommend a retail price
- It is illegal to force retailers to sell at that price
- Retailers must be free to compete on price
- Setting a minimum price is illegal
- Preventing retailers from discounting is illegal
- Setting a maximum price is legal (prevents price gouging in areas with no competition)
Mergers and acquisitions
While most mergers and acquisitions are legal and beneficial, the Act prohibits any merger or acquisition that would substantially reduce competition in a market.
Businesses proposing a merger or acquisition can ask the ACCC for permission. The ACCC will permit it only if it won't substantially limit competition. If businesses proceed without permission, the ACCC can investigate and take action.
Case Study: Vodafone and TPG Merger
In 2020, the Federal Court dismissed an ACCC attempt to block Vodafone's merger with TPG. The ACCC argued TPG could become an innovative competitor, but the Court allowed the merger to proceed.
Case Study: Big Four Banks Protection
The big four banks (ANZ, NAB, Westpac, and Commonwealth Bank) are specifically banned from merging with each other, as this would significantly reduce competition in banking.
Importance of fair competition
Fair competition benefits:
- Consumers: Through lower prices, better quality, and more choice
- Businesses: By creating an equal playing field and rewarding innovation
- The economy: By promoting efficiency and innovation
Businesses should be fair when referring to competitors in marketing and should not insult or make false assertions about them. Ethical competition strengthens the entire marketplace.
Sugging
Sugging — "selling under the guise of a survey" — is a sales technique disguised as market research. You may have experienced this if you've been:
- Approached in a shopping centre to complete a "survey"
- Contacted by telephone for product research that turns into a sales pitch
Although sugging is not illegal, it raises several ethical issues:
- Invasion of privacy: Collecting personal information under false pretences
- Deception: Misleading consumers about the purpose of contact
- Damage to legitimate research: People become suspicious of genuine market research
Impact on market research
Sugging has negative long-term consequences for legitimate market research:
- Response rates to surveys and questionnaires are declining
- About one-third of individuals now refuse to participate in surveys
- Suspicion that surveys are really sales attempts reduces cooperation
- This makes it harder for businesses to gather genuine consumer insights
Identifying sugging
Three Questions to Determine if a Call is a Legitimate Survey:
- Are you selling anything?
- Will my participation result in anyone contacting me to sell me anything?
- Will my name and personal information be sold or provided to anyone who will contact me to sell me anything?
If the answer to any of these is "yes", it's sugging, not genuine market research.
A marketing code of ethics
The Australian Association of National Advertisers (AANA) Code of Ethics 2012 sets standards for marketers and advertisers. The objectives are to ensure that advertisements and marketing communications are:
- Legal
- Decent
- Truthful
- Prepared with a sense of obligation to consumers and society
- Fair and responsible toward competitors
Ad Standards complaint resolution process
Ad Standards manages the complaint resolution process for the advertising self-regulation system. The process works as follows:
- Consumers complain: Anyone can submit a complaint to Ad Standards about an advertisement they believe breaches the Code
- Assessment: Ad Standards considers and assesses complaints against the Code
- Notification: The advertiser is notified and requested to provide a written response
- Community Panel review: Submissions are made to the Ad Standards Community Panel
- Determination: The Panel reaches a decision by simple majority
Possible determinations
The Community Panel can make two types of determinations:
- Dismissed complaints: The Panel determines there is no breach of a code or initiative
- Upheld complaints: The Panel determines there is a breach, and the advertiser is requested to remove or amend the advertisement as soon as possible
Case Study: AHM Health Insurance Advertisement
In 2020, Ad Standards banned an AHM health insurance advertisement featuring Andrew Symonds shoulder-charging a production assistant. Despite being a re-enactment of a cricket incident, the ad was found to depict workplace assault and glorify unprovoked violence and bullying.
Criticisms of self-regulation
Many consumer organisations argue that self-regulation is ineffective because:
Limitations of Self-Regulation:
- Ad Standards lacks authority to enforce the Code of Ethics
- Advertisers may be tempted to ignore industry guidelines
- No legal penalties exist for non-compliance
- Advertising standards should be regulated by government for effectiveness
Self-regulation is a system where a business or industry controls its own activities rather than being publicly regulated by an outside organisation like government.
Why ethical behaviour and government regulation are important
Benefits of ethical behaviour
Ethical behaviour in marketing provides significant advantages:
Marketing and business opportunities:
- Ethical businesses receive positive publicity in media, journals, and online
- Creates a positive brand image and reputation
- Attracts free publicity and good public relations
Customer attraction and loyalty:
- Attracts customers to the business
- Increases customer loyalty and repeat purchases
- Consumers actively seek out ethical brands
- Leads to increasing sales and profits
- Growing number of ethically-minded consumers who vote with their wallets
Employment relations:
- Improves productivity
- Better staff retention and lower turnover
- Reduced absenteeism rates
- Attracts talented employees who want to work for ethical companies
- Employees feel proud of their workplace
Financial benefits:
- Attracts more investors
- More appealing to stakeholders
- Enhances business reputation
- Potential for premium pricing
Consequences of unethical behaviour
Unethical behaviour eventually damages businesses:
- Customers discover which businesses are acting unethically
- Negative publicity damages reputation
- Customers may boycott products
- Reduced appeal to stakeholders and investors
- Loss of talented employees
- Potential legal action and fines
- Long-term damage to brand value
Importance of government regulation
Government regulation relating to marketing is important because it:
Protects consumers:
- Prevents misleading and deceptive conduct
- Ensures product safety
- Provides remedies when things go wrong
- Protects vulnerable consumers (like children)
Protects businesses:
- Creates a level playing field
- Prevents unfair competitive practices
- Protects smaller businesses from being eliminated by larger competitors
- Rewards innovation and efficiency
Benefits the economy:
- Increases consumer trust and confidence
- Results in people buying more products
- Promotes competition and fair trade
- Benefits consumers, businesses, and the community
- Creates a more efficient marketplace
Encourages good behaviour:
- Provides clear standards for business conduct
- Creates penalties for non-compliance
- Encourages businesses to do the right thing
- Deters unethical practices
Promotes competition:
- Stimulates fair trade and competition
- Creates more equal playing field
- Prevents monopolies and cartels
- Benefits consumers through lower prices and better quality
Remember!
Key Points to Remember:
- Ethical behaviour goes beyond legal requirements — it's about doing what's right, not just what's legal
- Main ethical criticisms of marketing include materialism, stereotyping, use of sex appeal, product placement, and privacy invasion
- Truth and accuracy issues arise from concealed facts, exaggerated claims (puffery), and vague statements
- Good taste in advertising is subjective but marketers must be aware of community sensitivities
- Marketing of products that damage health (especially junk food to children) is a major ethical concern
- The Competition and Consumer Act 2010 requires fair competition and prohibits cartels, misuse of market power, exclusive dealing, resale price maintenance, and anti-competitive mergers
- Sugging (selling under the guise of a survey) is unethical but not illegal
- The AANA Code of Ethics and Ad Standards provide self-regulation for advertising
- Ethical behaviour attracts customers, improves reputation, and increases profits
- Government regulation protects consumers and businesses while promoting fair competition
Key Terms:
- Ethical behaviour: Conduct that goes beyond legal requirements
- Materialism: An individual's desire to constantly acquire possessions
- Product placement: The inclusion of advertising in entertainment
- Advertising: A paid, non-personal message communicated through a mass medium
- Puffery: Exaggerated claims that no reasonable person would take as factual
- Sugging: Selling under the guise of a survey
- Self-regulation: Industry controlling its own activities without government oversight
Critical Frameworks:
- AANA Code of Ethics — industry self-regulation for advertising standards
- Competition and Consumer Act 2010 — government regulation requiring fair competition
- Ad Standards — manages complaint resolution for advertising
- ACL consumer guarantees — protects consumers from unsafe products